My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-08-28 TKOHALA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-08-28 TKOHALA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:38:03 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:38:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that that was going to be too much of a downzoning that would subject them to liability. They <br />knew that we had already retained mainland counsel and HawaiÒi counsel for the takings <br />litigation both at the HawaiÒi Supreme Court level and the U.S. Supreme Court level. And so I <br />think that they felt that we were ready to go and they didnÓt feel comfortable that the 15-acre <br />zoning, downzoning was going to be passing constitutional muster. <br /> <br />So what we did was, since the Planning Commission meeting in November of last year, weÓve <br />been in planning efforts. We work with Greg Mooers who can give you a little bit of a report on <br />where we are today. And I think what youÓll see is that what we are thinking about proposing Î <br />and I want to stress this is still very early on in the game Î what we are thinking of proposing is <br />going to be similar to what the Planning Director was proposing. However, we feel that the 3- <br />acre, is what we are going to propose, RA 3-acre zoning is going to be more in keeping with the <br />neighborhood. As you see in the Kohala Ranch, is a project up there, the light-blue is 3-acre <br />zoning. The next door to us is 5-acre zoning. So itÓs all consistent with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />And what we are doing today is a status report without asking for any vote by the Planning <br />Commission. But we would like comments from you, so we can take that back into our planning <br />effort. We wanted to come and give you something to look at and to chew on because I think itÓs <br />important for my client to have some feedback from you and to then decide whether we either <br />come back in on time extension on the existing SMA Permit or we file a brand new change of <br />zone and an SMA Permit. So weÓre going to be discussing that issue with the Planning Director. <br />WeÓd obviously like to preserve the entitlements that we have until there is a final action on the <br />eventual approvals for the project, if we were so lucky. So IÓll go ahead and turn that over to <br />Greg Mooers to describe. His efforts have been over the course of the last several months. <br /> <br />MOOERS: Thank you, Steve. Steve approached myself about, or asked me if I take a <br />look at the project maybe from a fresh perspective. I worked with Belt Collins Hawaii to provide <br />planning and engineering backup to reevaluate the project site. Really two areas I looked at <br />initially Î one with the institutional consideration which is the General Plan, the zoning, the <br />existing permitting, SMA, of not only this property but the surrounding property, and then the <br />second issue was looking at infrastructural issues, the actual topography of the property, setbacks <br />from the ocean, setbacks from the roadway, gulches, archaeological sites, and try to come up <br />with what we felt was the best use of the property without disturbing the existing landforms. We <br />went through several iterations, have been back and forth over the site many times, and believe <br />that where we are headed with this, the site plan that is shown there Î do you have the individual <br />site plans or -? Just the big site plan. So what we tried to do is, the first thing we did is we drew <br />a line at 150 feet away from the roadway to provide a setback from the roadway Î if you are <br />familiar with the topography here and also if you look at the aerial photo, the property does drop <br />away from the roadway quite a bit Î so that, like moving 150 feet out, it would eliminate any <br />visual impact of someone driving on Akoni Pule Highway and looking to the distance or horizon <br />and to Kohala coast from seeing any structures at all; the only structure you would see is if you <br />are at the edge of the road and you look down on the property. There are no coastline views <br />from the roadway; in other words you do not see the surf line anywhere along this property <br />because of the topography and because of the existing vegetation. The second thing we did is we <br />drew up a 150-foot setback along the ocean to move all of structures back away so there will be <br />no impact visually looking from the ocean up toward the highway, or try to minimize the impact, <br />I should say. The other thing we did is we placed and sited all of the archaeological features <br />EXHIBIT B <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.