My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Additional Opposition Testimonies from Numerous Individuals (3) for Kaupulehu Land LLC 07.17.23 thru 07.18.23
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2023
>
2023-08-09 Leeward
>
Item #2 Kaupulehu Land (PL-REZ-2022-000039)
>
Additional Testimonies Received Since 07.06.23
>
Additional Opposition Testimonies from Numerous Individuals (3) for Kaupulehu Land LLC 07.17.23 thru 07.18.23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2023 12:15:05 PM
Creation date
7/24/2023 12:14:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Related Permits
PL-SLU-2022-000008
Permit Number
PL-REZ-2022-000039
Parcel Number
640240270000
Description
Additional Opposition Testimonies from Numerous Individuals (3) for Kaupulehu Land LLC 07.17.23 thru 07.18.23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
b. <br /> For example, I believe one of the requirements is for a sidewalk in front of the subject <br /> property, but it would be a sidewalk connecting to nothing. A full uninterrupted <br /> sidewalk doesn't begin for another '/2 mile at the corner of Mamalahoa and Kamamalu. <br /> Again, how does this project make sense in the context of the community? <br /> 4. <br /> When asked specifically, the applicant declined having thought about CC&Rs for the <br /> residential portion of the property and stated that he was most likely going to sell the vacant <br /> lots. So yes, while the existing two homes are charming, the applicant doesn't intend on <br /> developing the other homes himself(which is the correct decision from a financial <br /> standpoint). So there is no reason to rely on the existing homes as an example of how the <br /> others will be built. <br /> 5. <br /> The applicant also stated that selling the lots undeveloped is the "most affordable" way for <br /> buyers to purchase. However, buying vacant land and building requires you either use cash <br /> OR a construction loan, neither of which are affordable by most standards, especially in the <br /> current lending landscape. Combine that with FEMA flood insurance and these lots are not <br /> contributing in any way to affordable housing in Waimea. <br /> 6. <br /> As part of the Commission's discussion on the application, it was mentioned that young <br /> people aren't ranching anymore and therefore it makes sense to turn the land into smaller <br /> lots. A few points on that: <br /> a. <br /> The size of the proposed residential portion is not a vast ranch, but is beautifully <br /> suitable for family and community farming. <br /> b. <br /> There are, in fact, many young families with a growing interest in food autonomy and <br /> sustainability, for which the approximately 3 acres would be both manageable and <br /> perfect to achieve those goals. <br /> C. <br /> We live directly behind the parcel and have harvested our own beef, produce our own <br /> eggs, and grow plenty of vegetables to share with our friends. This is what the <br /> Waimea community is about. <br /> d. <br /> Once you chop up the land, you don't get it back, and you set a precedent for the Ag-5 <br /> land around it to also slowly be converted to smaller parcels. <br /> 7. <br /> The legal representatives of the applicant went through a lengthy presentation on how they <br /> changed the plans based on the feedback from the last hearing: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.