2007-08-31 TCOUNCIL-SUBDIVISION - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

of that planning process. It’s not our laws. The General Plan, the general statement about what we do, you know, how we want things to develop, it’s not really an enforceable document. The zoning laws and the subdivision laws, it’s not a plan. Those are administrative, basically some guidelines in administrative functions as far as the Subdivision Law. And so I’m going to vote against, or I’ll do a negative recommendation.But I really think that, you know, our Charter says that this Commission is supposed to give some counsel advice to the County Council about how to do things, right? And you know, Commissioner Woodward is right; we’re not experts on this, right? We are not, none of us have planning degrees and all of that. But that’s not to say, you know, it’s a community issue. What happens to our land and our water and our air, that’s a community issue. And we don’t need experts to tell us, you know; we can see for ourselves that it’s – excuse my French – getting screwed up, has been screwed up. So I think the message should go back to the Council that we need to do something different. And as most of the Commissioners know, my answer to that is to fully implement the Community Development Plans in an effective community engaging way. And then so we can draw the lines on the ground, so the developers know where they can develop, you know, and make it easier for them to get their development money loosened up. But at the same time those lands (lines) will protect our agriculture and conservation, you know, those green areas that we want to keep, so that my grandchild hopefully one day can have some of the benefit that I’ve had, being born and raised here. So that’s my spiel that Commissioner Alameda was trying to avoid me having to say.But these are the kind of opportunities, you know, this kind of – I would call it – piece-meal legislation that really is not going to be effective in any way; just says our present Zoning and Subdivision and General Plan are ineffective planning documents. They are Land Use Laws, but they really have no effect in terms of giving a clear vision for how this island is going to look in 30, 40, 50 years. The documents don’t. You go to Maui and Oahu, you can see what’s going to happen, until we do something out of the box. And the Council has to do that; it has the power to do that. You know, we are all swimming down a stream – we are not even swimming – we are being pushed down a stream, and we are going to end up in the same mess Maui and Oahu are in. GRAHAM: Thank you. Any other comments from Commissioners? WATANABE: Mr. Chair. GRAHAM: Yes, Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE: Mr. Chair, I whole-heartedly agree with Mr. Woodward’s statement, especially in light of the previous two bills that we sent a negative recommendation on and the discussions they are having with the additional flood control. And with that, I’m ready, prepared to make a motion, if that’s in order. GRAHAM: Yeah, I had one comment I’d like to make too as long as everybody is making comments. WATANABE: Sure. GRAHAM: I agree with the general thrust of Commissioner Woodward; that you want the decisions to be made where the expertise is. And I think the only difference in what maybe is valuable about what the Council is putting forth here is that it does become a EXHIBIT F 4