Laserfiche WebLink
matter. Page 6, Item 22, it says “there were no objections raised,” I think it should say “by any <br />of the surrounding property owners;” again, just a grammatical thing. And there were a couple <br />of technical matters that I would insert in almost any proposed Findings; and I gave some text to <br />Mr. Darrow. Maybe he could read that out. <br />WOODWARD: I would amend that to as corrected by Mr. Torigoe. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Mr. Darrow, you want to go ahead? <br />DARROW: Sure. If I could just ask Mr. Torigoe, the first change is on page 4, which <br />item? <br />TORIGOE: On page 4, item, it’s actually end of Item 6 where it says “limited warrant <br />deed.” <br />DARROW: Okay. Thank you. The inclusion would be, the last findings of fact would <br />be as follows: The Planning Commission has considered all proposed findings of facts offered <br />by each party. The intent of all proposed findings consistent with the findings herein are <br />incorporated herein with the specific language herein to govern. All proposed findings <br />inconsistent with or contrary to the findings herein are rejected.” And then also a Conclusion of <br />Law will be added that says “Based on the foregoing findings and conclusions, the proposed use <br />is an unusual and reasonable use under HRS 205-6.” <br />GRAHAM: Is that acceptable, Commissioner Woodward? <br />WOODWARD: Absolutely. <br />WATANABE: I -. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Watanabe. <br />WATANABE: I accept it as a friendly -. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. I had one other objection to the proposed Findings that struck <br />me that I might just bring it to your attention to see how you feel about that. It’s No. 9, under the <br />conclusions of law, says “The proposed bed and breakfast use will have no greater impact on the <br />property than the underlying single family dwelling which currently occupies the property.” I <br />think that’s totally unnecessary to say it. I don’t tend to believe it’s true and certainly feel that <br />it’s not substantiated by anything we’ve had before us. So I would like to just omit that No. 9, if <br />that’s okay. <br />WOODWARD: It’s all right with me. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: Yeah, that’s fine with me. <br />EXHIBIT A <br />12 <br /> <br />