Laserfiche WebLink
good cause, continue the matter to a more appropriate time and date. So basically you need to <br />take up each of the petitions individually and make the determination whether they are eligible to <br />intervene as parties. <br />GRAHAM: All right. Commissioners, is that all clear? So maybe we’ll start <br />with Richard Gilroy, or maybe -. Should I bring them forward one at a time, you think? Is <br />Richard Gilroy here today? He does not appear to be present. <br />ALAMEDA: Chair? <br />GRAHAM: Yes. <br />ALAMEDA: Sorry to interrupt. What kind of action are we supposed to take <br />with these contested proposals? <br />GRAHAM: Generally, what’s before us is to accept them as intervenors in a <br />contested case hearing or not accept them. So generally they would come forward and give us a <br />few words on why they are intervening, and we would make a decision based on our Rules as to <br />whether we accept them as intervenors. <br />ALAMEDA: Right. That’s what I thought. But since he is not here, how do we <br />proceed? <br />GRAHAM: I think we proceed, we go ahead with just what we’ve got from <br />him in writing. <br />ALAMEDA: Okay. <br />GRAHAM: I might ask the applicant if you have any position that you would <br />take on this particular intervenor or any of the other intervenors.Maybe it would be wise to just <br />speak to that whole issue first, so you don’t have to keep coming forward. Thank you. <br />LIM: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Lim, you were sworn in before, that’s fine. <br />LIM: Thank you. Steve Lim representing Stanford Carr Development, <br />LLC for the development of the M sites at Mauna Lani. Our position on the first three contested <br />case requests, which is by Mr. Richard Gilroy, the Villages at Mauna Lani Association of <br />Apartment Owners, and the Mauna Lani Resort Association, is a general objection to their <br />standing based upon failure to meet the conditions for standing in the Planning Commission Rule <br />4 relating to Contested Case. With respect to the fourth intervenor, Mr. Batinovich, we file our <br />formal objection with the Planning Commission, which basically raises the issues of the <br />defective filing because of the no filing fee and failure to notarize his statement, which <br />Mr. Darrow raised already. We would maintain these objections for all four of these <br />interventions. Thank you. <br />EXHIBIT H <br />3 <br /> <br />