Laserfiche WebLink
GRAHAM: Thank you. Mr. Lim sort of objected to yours and the others’ <br />inclusions as intervenors based generally on Rule 4, he said. Do you have any particular <br />response to what he had to say there? <br />VITOUSEK: Yes. I think that the criteria for standing in Rule 4, whether the <br />applicant has an interest in the subject matter of the application, which is clearly distinguishable <br />from the general public, and I think that based on what we submitted in our application for <br />standing and what I’ve represented to the Commission today, that we clearly and unquestionably <br />meet the criteria for standing to intervene or standing to request a contested case. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Do we have any questions, Commissioners? <br />Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I just have a question for Jeff. This is one of the intervenors or <br />potential intervenors that did file in a timely manner with the notarized form and the filing fee? <br />DARROW: Yes. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. Any other questions from the Commissioners? Well, I’ll be <br />open for a motion for either accepting or not accepting this intervenor. <br />IWASHITA: Chair? <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: Is it appropriate to allow the applicant to respond in any way to the <br />intervenor’s presentation? <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Lim, if you have any further comments to make regarding this <br />specific application? <br />LIM: We have nothing further. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Commissioner Watanabe? <br />WATANABE: I move to grant standing to – oh, I forget, which one now, what is <br />it – Mauna Lani Association? <br />GRAHAM: Mauna Lani Resort Association. <br />WATANABE: Mauna Lani Resort Association in this SMA for Stanford Carr. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Do we have a second? <br />RHO: Second. <br />EXHIBIT H <br />5 <br /> <br />