My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-01 TIIDA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-09-01 TIIDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:43:09 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:43:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
southern part of town; and this would be appropriate. And notwithstanding the fact that you <br />have the old Food Fair building there, I think you have several uses of commercial type situating <br />there, and also offices and the like. So, you know, I’m looking up to the point of Kahaopea <br />Street an ideal place or area in which future development can take place. <br />And my, you know, to the Planning Commission, my problem is because we’re looking at what’s <br />there on the map and what’s, where the application is, you know, would it be wiser that we <br />anticipate growth taking place there and just not put any restrictions to it? I have strong <br />reservations about putting restrictions on any particular zoning. It sends out, it sends a different <br />kind of signal to the public as far as the ability of the, of any developer making plans with <br />regards to establishing a business, or developing any housing, or whatever. For them it’s <br />important to know that what’s there is there and what’s not there is not there. And what they can <br />do, and what they can’t do, it’s very important. I think in this particular case, it also applies to <br />the applicant. <br />I remember many years ago when I was on the County Council there was this foot doctor, and <br />there was an application up Ponahawai, and it’s above the jail within the residential area. He had <br />a property and he came in for rezoning. It was a big issue because given a commercial zoning <br />the people in the development were very concerned about the possibility what might happen if <br />this individual had sold his property; and then with that commercial zoning he would be able to <br />put in a service station and other uses. So what we did at that time is did exactly what we’re <br />talking about today, you know, contract zoning, allowing only a particular use within the zoning <br />to be conducted. And, you know, it’s always a scary position for me as I look at that because in <br />the event that individual sells the property or in the event that individual needs to change the use <br />of that property, you know, then he had to go through the same procedures that this applicant is <br />going through; and I don’t think it’s fair for them. Once you give a person a rezoning I think <br />they should be comfortable that under that zoning they’re permitted all these uses, with no <br />restrictions whatsoever. And that’s where I’m sitting at right now. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Thank you, Commissioner Domingo. Do we have any other <br />questions? Okay, seeing none, you folks may be seated. Thank you very much. And we’ve <br />already had a little deliberation, but now we can really deliberate. We have nobody signed up <br />from the public to testify. So would somebody care to make a motion? Commissioner <br />Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman, I move for the deletion of the previous condition imposed on them <br />on Rezoning Application 07-073. <br />WOODWARD: Condition D? <br />DOMINGO: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. Do we have a second? <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.