Laserfiche WebLink
ONO: And if that should ever occur, do they have to face the Planning Commission again? <br />COTTLE: No. <br />ONO: So this is -? <br />COTTLE: Not the way the condition is written now. <br />ONO: So this would be just a blanket permission for them to expand it into a restaurant without <br />permission? <br />COTTLE: Potentially that could happen with the CN zoning, yes. <br />ONO: Thank you. <br />COTTLE: You’re welcome. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, any further questions before we have the applicant up? <br />DOMINGO: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Maija, you know, they’re coming in for, first they want a condition be deleted and <br />they’re coming in for another amendment to that, to the previous action taken on the zoning. <br />What if, you know, based on the past action we just say, okay, the zoning is granted and we not <br />put any amendments to it or take any action to it, would they then be able to conduct a CN <br />zoning, Medium Density uses on that property? <br />COTTLE: Are you asking if you do not change the ordinance and you leave it as it is now? <br />DOMINGO: Yeah. And even with withdrawal, delete that condition that its uses should only be <br />a reflection of that having a residential nature and all that. <br />COTTLE: Yeah, so what you’re asking if that condition were deleted, which is what the <br />applicants are requesting, then what would happen is any permitted use in the CN district would <br />be allowed. So they could establish a restaurant, they could establish a convenience store, <br />there’s a variety of uses that they could establish on that property if Condition D were deleted. <br />DOMINGO: You know, this is something that I’m wrestling with because we give them the <br />zoning with conditions and now they’re coming in with an application to delete that amendment <br />with restrictions, but then they’re coming in with another, another application for the expansion <br />of the existing uses. <br />5 <br /> <br />