2005-09-02 TMALASEKO2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

job? And its a rhetorical question. I mean either the Planning Department hired these people because they felt that they were competent and qualified to make the call or not. Thank you. GALDONES:Commissioners, any further discussion or any further questions? Seeing that theres no further questions and I dont see anyone else from the public here to testify, the Chair is going to declare the public testimony part of this hearing closed. Were going into decision making. Commissioners, the Planning Director recommends that the claim be denied by the Planning Commission. IWASHITA:Mr. Chair? GALDONES:Commissioner Iwashita. IWASHITA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. Im prepared to make a motion. GALDONES:Motion is in order. IWASHITA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. I move that the Planning Commission choose not toconsidertheclaimsadjusters,Idontknowifthis,itssortofawkwardlanguage.Ichoose that the Planning Commission, I choose, I move that the Planning Commission pursuant to Rule 14-8(e) defer to the Claim Adjusters recommendation. GALDONES:Seeing that theres no second, is it because there is no clarity to his motion or there will be no second to his motion? SPRINGER:Could I have the motion repeated? IWASHITA:Certainly. I move that the Planning Commission pursuant to Rule 14-8(e) defer to the recommendation of the claims adjuster. SPRINGER:May I have a further clarification -? IWASHITA:Sure. SPRINGER:Of what the motion is? Does that include, he gives a range for payment. IWASHITA:Yeah, I understand the concern expressed about that. But, you know, thats the way the report came in; and the reason for my motion is that I think thats, given everything that has happened in these proceedings, I think thats the best way to go. But thats why I make it. If nobody wants to second, thats up to you guys. SPRINGER:Second, for the purposes of discussion and then discussion. IWASHITA:Thank you. 18