My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-02 TMALASEKO2
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-09-02 TMALASEKO2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:45:54 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:45:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Im just wondering if, I wasnt at the last meeting but in my reading of the <br />record of it I see that Commissioner Iwashita had a number of concerns about the completeness <br />of the record. And Im wondering if those concerns remain or if you could help bring me up to <br />speed on the discussion of your concerns. <br />IWASHITA:I can tell you what I presently think. Well, I guess Ill answer you this <br />way that in reviewing this matter again before todays proceeding it appears to me the way <br />Rule 14 is written, the rule that controls our actions on this, is theres great or much of the <br />language -. Sections 14-9, portions of 14-8, 14-6, all make reference to this matter, you know, <br />initially being handle by the adjuster, in this case Wood & Tait, and recommendations being <br />presented, and the fact that if this body does not take action within 90 days of receipt of, if this <br />body does not take action within 90 days from the closing of the hearing that the adjusters <br />recommendation becomes final. I did express some questions about the completeness of the <br />recommendationandthereportwereceivedasitdoesntappeartocomplywithsomeofthe <br />requirements of 14-9. But, in any event, the suggestion at the time was, well, thats okay, you <br />know, they did the best they could. So thats how I would respond to your question at this time. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Further discussion, further questions? Commissioner Salavea. <br />SALAVEA:To your knowledge was there any impact to the fruit trees on the property <br />from the blowout that you referred to, I think you said in 91, in terms of their fruit-bearing <br />ability? <br />OLSON:The impact from the H2S, no. There was earlier impact from the caustic <br />soda. They had a system, a scrubber system. They used caustic soda to neutralize the H2S that <br />was leaking from the plant and from the wells; and they had a vacuum system set up. It sucked <br />all of this into a central location, and then they poured caustic soda on it; and this was all done in <br />an open air tank. So if they didnt get the mix right, in other words at some point youd have not <br />enough caustic soda, you get the H2S. If you didnt, sometimes thered be too much caustic <br />soda, it would go airborne and it formed this white powder on everything around the plant. It <br />was reported in the newspaper, samples were taken. The Health Department knows about it. <br />You know, they were very ambiguous about it; but samples were sent out and it was analyzed <br />and -. So the short answer to the process, yes, it did affect his crops and it, you know, ate roofs <br />on houses and things like that around the plant. <br />SALAVEA:And currently are his plants still surviving now or have they all withered? <br />OLSON:Well, whoever purchased the place, it doesnt appear that theyre making <br />any effort to continue the farming operation there, so I really cant say. <br />SALAVEA:And to what point did he continue to farm his crops, up to the point that he <br />sold the property? <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.