My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-02 TFIRE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-09-02 TFIRE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:45:54 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:45:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and the ambulance can get in and out of town the way things are now as compared to what the <br />new situation would be. <br />SAFARIK:Well, I think that you used the word ease rather loosely because I think <br />that what were doing is putting our citizens at risk by having our present fire station and the <br />response needed from the middle of town. But I dont think anybody ever believed that Pahoa <br />would grow to the extent it has grown. And with the shifting of the industrial or the new part of <br />Pahoa town being more towards the western end of that urban core as evidenced by the Malama <br />Market, which is located right here, a lot of the new businesses are siting themselves in that area. <br />However, as you know, it has always been our hope and our vision that the old part of Pahoa <br />possibly would be utilized as a promenade, the roadway that goes between the old fire station, or <br />hopefully to be the old fire station, and a restaurant known as God Mothers or, its a different <br />name now. So our vision would be to eliminate having access through the middle of town in the <br />future. So this locating of the fire and public safety facilities on the bypass road makes a lot of <br />senseandfallsinlinewithourfutureplansforthatparticulararea. <br />SIRACUSA:Thankyou.Commissioners,anyfurtherquestions?Ifnot,Commissioner <br />Springer. <br />SPRINGER:With regard to the location of the, or relocating the access point, what <br />condition would that fall under? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer, before you proceed -. <br />SPRINGER:Im sorry. <br />GALDONES:Do you have any questions of Councilman Safarik? <br />SPRINGER:Sorry, no, I dont. <br />GALDONES:Otherwise Id like to have him excused from the podium. <br />SPRINGER:Sorry. <br />GALDONES:If not, thank you very much, Councilman. <br />SAFARIK:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen, in reference, in response to Commissioner Springers question? <br />YUEN:I dont think its covered by any of our conditions. They would have to <br />secure approval from the DOT. The way weve written the special permit does not tie them into <br />that access point. So, but their current deed does, the executive order does tie, does only permit <br />those, that one access point on this part of the property. So they would have to, and the DOT <br />controls that, so they would have to get a new access point, negotiate with the DOT. But nothing <br />in our conditions ties them into one or the other. <br />8EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.