My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-05-09 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Kailua Village Design Commission
>
Minutes
>
2006-2024
>
2023
>
2023-05-09 Kailua Village Design Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2023 2:46:58 PM
Creation date
8/8/2023 2:46:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Applicant: Zach Hanson of Christopher Kidd and Associates LLC <br />Landowner: Lili‘uokalani Trust Estate <br />TMK: (3) 7-4-015:001 <br />Location: 74-5588 Palani Road, Suite 29, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 <br />Ms. Bugado gave a PowerPoint presentation on the proposed wall sign. She noted that the <br />proposed sign would require a variance because of the sign height, lettering and symbol size <br />but that the proposed sign is on a wall of the existing building that is not visible from the <br />surrounding roadways. There is an existing master sign plan for the Kona Coast Shopping <br />Center and Ms. Bugado went through the differences of the sign code, existing master sign <br />plan and the proposed sign. Ms. Bugado also pointed out that the master sign plan <br />considered that the area that is proposed for the sign was an anchor store with the renovation <br />of the store area into individual store lots it is no longer an anchor store and would no longer <br />get the allowances for the anchor store. <br />Chair Roth requested confirmation of the need for a variance. Ms. Bugado pointed out the <br />comment from the Department of Public Works Building Division which pointed out that <br />they proposed sign did not meet the sign code and from the review done on the variance it <br />did not meet the variance allowances. <br />Commissioner Greenwell asked if a sign variance had already been applied for? Ms. Bugado <br />stated that no variance had been applied for. The discussion also clarified the proposed sign <br />– being one sign on the side of the building away from the main parking area. <br />Mr. Zach Hanson confirmed the location of the sign and stated that there in another vacant <br />tenant lot on the on the front portion of the area and so that section of the building front was <br />not available for a sign. He also pointed out that the location of the building sits below the <br />road. And they had designed the sign to match the location and size of the Pier One store. <br />With the intent that it be visible from the road. <br />Ms. Angie Cupples from the applicant requested clarification from Chair Roth regarding <br />discussion points that he made in favor of the proposed sign. Chair Roth confirmed that he <br />stated that he is in favor of the sign as presented and based on the location of the proposed <br />sign that it appears that a variance would be needed. Ms. Cupples stated that they had <br />originally proposed a larger set but in discussion with the Building Division brought the <br />square footage down. <br />It was moved by Commissioner Greenwell and seconded by Commissioner Lussiaa that the <br />Commission recommends approval of the sign as submitted, including any required variance <br />as needed. There being no discussion on the motion, a roll call vote was taken, and the <br />motion carried with five ayes (Greenwell, Ka‘ōpua, Kossow, Lussiaa and Roth), and three <br />absent and excused (Kern, Kilkuskie and Young). <br />ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS <br />The Commission discussed the time of the meetings. Chair Roth confirmed that this request for <br />discussion originated with a new commission member. Commissioner Lussiaa discussed that the <br />late afternoon time frame was challenging and would like to see if the commission would find it <br />workable for the meeting to be either late morning or midday. The commission found that the <br />request was workable and determined that the official time would be 1:00 pm but that it would <br />be flexible based on the amount or complexity of applications to review for an earlier start. <br />2 <br />Kailua Village Design Commission <br />May 9, 2023, Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.