My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2023 7:58:41 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />July 11, 2023 <br />CHR. PAVAO: Yeah, I think that the conversation around budget comes up every time the <br />salary commission has convened in the past. I see it in the previous minutes. And, although we <br />should be cognizant of that, it's not in the Charter—our responsibility to pay attention to the <br />budget. Our responsibility is to do due diligence and to make salary raises according as to what <br />we think is acceptable. There's six of the nine of us vote to approve the salary raises that's the <br />law. The county council, the mayor—nobody else gets to veto or approve it. We make the final <br />decision. <br />But—so, I remember reading in the minutes that one of the salary commissioners asked Mayor <br />Kim when he was here before the commission—"We're going to approve this. Is there money in <br />the budget to cover these raises? And his response is—it's not your concern. You pass the <br />salary raises. It's my concern to find the money to pay the raises." <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Commissioner Greenbaum to Commissioner Nakama, I believe the <br />reason for the large increase, if I recall correctly, and I wasn't on the Commission in 2018. But I <br />came thereafter—and they had mentioned that it had to do with 10 years of no increase. And <br />from 2008 to 2018—it was 10I believe 5 to 10 years of no increase, which caused that higher <br />increase to be proposed. I don't know what they ended up with, but that was the reason for the <br />higher increase proposal. And that's something I would hope we don't encounter because of <br />delays. <br />CHR. PAVAO: I think that we're almost in a similar situation because it's been a number of <br />years. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Correct. <br />CHR. PAVAO: One of the things that we try to consider—and I know there was some previous <br />discussion even the last meeting—is some process of step movements because, if we just make <br />an increase now and the Salary Commission doesn't convene for another 3, 4, 5, years you end <br />up with the same situation. <br />And it gets harder and harder for the County to recruit and retain the best employees because <br />even, like public works, you get a new mayor—some of the best employees for that director <br />position are within the department. But an engineer in public works is going to refuse the <br />appointment because they're going to take a big pay cut, which is now they're going to have an <br />impact on their current salary but has a long-term impact on their retirement. <br />The same problem happened with the current recruitment for the chief. I asked people in the <br />department and my response was thatoh, from captains and majors up make more than their <br />current chiefs, so why would be apply for that job? <br />So, it becomes an issue with recruiting and retaining staff. But—so, hopefully, we can come up <br />with an appropriate salary schedule now but something that can see increases. Because even <br />when you talk about collective bargaining, the bargaining units have contracts. Most of them <br />that expire July 1st well, July 1" '25 is the last pay increase, but—so if they get 4 percent now, <br />Page 27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.