Laserfiche WebLink
As noted earlier, the Applicants' plans call for the subject site to be <br /> subdivided into six (6) lots, with each lot consisting of a minimum of five <br /> (5) + acres. As proposed, five (5) lots would consist of slightly more than <br /> five (5) acres, while the remaining lot would consist of nine (9) + acres. <br /> With the exception of the largest lot, all lots would have access from the <br /> Old Mamalahoa Highway. The remaining and largest lot would have <br /> access from Waokele Street. (Figure 3) <br /> The Applicants reside periodically in an existing dwelling situated at the <br /> western end of the subject site. Once the land is subdivided, however, <br /> they may choose to construct and live in a new dwelling on one of the <br /> other lots. <br /> It is understood that the subdivision plan submitted herein may change <br /> prior to receipt of final subdivision approval to accommodate the <br /> Applicants' plans as well as to comply with County subdivision <br /> requirements and appropriate zoning conditions of approval. <br /> C. Project Timetable and Cost <br /> The Applicants hope to secure the necessary County rezoning approval <br /> as soon as possible and begin the subdivision process as soon as <br /> feasible. Tentatively, barring any processing glitches, the Applicants <br /> would like to have the land subdivided before the end of 2028 or sooner. <br /> The cost of the infrastructure improvements is estimated at $100,000. <br /> This would largely to provide the needed water service laterals and <br /> related water improvements. <br /> IV. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> This section merely summarizes the principal land use regulations affecting <br /> the subject property. A discussion of the relationship of these regulations <br /> relative to the request is found in Chapter IX - Regulatory Analysis. <br /> A. State Land Use <br /> The entire site is within the State Land Use Agricultural district. The <br /> proposed five (5) acre lot size and intended agricultural use would be <br /> consistent with the rules and regulations governing the State Land Use <br /> Agricultural District. Hence, there is no need to have the district boundary <br /> amended. <br /> 3 <br />