My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-08-04 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-08-04 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2023 8:19:44 AM
Creation date
9/8/2023 8:18:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission August 4, 2023 <br />So, a very large number of employees with lot of seniority were given all the overtime and all the <br />double time and Saturdays and Sundays to make their salary a behemoth, which almost brought <br />the pension system down at the tune of three -and -a -half billion a year. That, we need to make a <br />decision—how do you want to make that decision? The simple rule is for managerial employees <br />you can create a structure of satisfactory average—for those (inaudible)whatever human <br />resources come and give them the increment based upon some kind of a criteria. <br />In New Jersey, we did that to take the union increments the smallest one and the largest one. <br />Between those two the supervising authority whether it was the mayor or the water commission, <br />chose what percentage or number they wanted to give to that position. Let's say police <br />commissioner got 3,500 out of the increment annually, until the next round of decision. <br />The third component of that was the cost of living. The cost of living there are different <br />calculations that could be done. And, moneywise, a resolution could be brought before the <br />council—and they're the final authority that the cost of living would be this in contrast to the <br />collective bargaining agreements that has already gotten that. And if you don't pay attention to <br />that, you could have an all-American nightmare in 200 union members will come in and all the <br />money's gone to management and none is going to us. <br />And, last, the fourth component to that would be whether other costs that have changed or <br />potentially can change that would make the position salary less than the nominal number that we <br />would recommend. For instance, healthcare and some of the other out-of-pocket things that you <br />would want to give them. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Chair Farahi, may I <br />ACTING CHR FARAHL Sure. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Points 1, 2, and 3 I think are really important and so that we can walk the <br />fence line of the duties that are ahead of us. I would like to suggest that the starting point be <br />found on the final two pages of Communication—wait, yeah-06-08-23—aka the last two pages <br />in the blue binder. <br />And what that is, is it's the executive salary jurisdiction comparisons. I think that it's going to <br />be, otherwise, it's difficult to anchor those factors without this being, I think, the initial vortex. <br />Because it allows us to at least see—and, again, I'm coming from the EUTF point of viewI'm <br />looking at all the employers in comparison to each other. <br />And so, where I freely admit I have some baggage about this because I had to fight or advocate <br />for Hawaii County over the—against and with, alongside the other neighbor island counties <br />when we were dealing with healthcare concerns. <br />So, spitting out numbers like we have 200,000 population on the Big Island and there's over <br />4,000 square miles and looking at some of the concerns—and then how we anchor into that. <br />Whereas Maui County is there156,000 population; Molokai out of that is 10,000 population; <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.