My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-08-30 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-08-30 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 3:13:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2023 3:09:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />August 30, 2023 <br />MR. KUNZ: But it also looks like Maui and Kauai are in 2023 salary ranges and Hawaii still <br />back in 2022so, they may have already had their schedules increased. Is that a possibility? <br />MR. PATEL: Yes. So, City and Maui recently increased. Hawai`i's—our schedules are from <br />7/l/2022 but those have been the pay amounts since 2018. Yeah. <br />MR. KUNZ: So, no doubt it warrants a increase but I think understanding that proportionately <br />Maui and Kauai have received theirs—and then, now we can—it's not really apples and apples. <br />It's probably a lot different if we saw their actual 2022 salary schedule. <br />I'm just uncomfortable, arbitrarily, throwing out a number. I mean, granted, Danny, I think <br />having heard now if the mayor or others who have their salary at their own will, suggesting what <br />they are worth—leaving it to the commission and understanding that the commission has the best <br />interest of understanding the number of years that there was no increase this reminds me of our <br />branch manager—Gabe and Gay, you know who he is. Because they were in the EM's and they <br />hadn't gotten increases for 10 years. And so, it was kind of incredible, but I would suspect that <br />the commission has the best interest of each of the department heads. And following suit with <br />the other counties, no doubt, there'll be an increase. <br />I just have a hard time suggesting anywhere from 10, 15, or 18 percent—that's, kind of, out of <br />my scope of negotiating skills. `Cause I don't—so, I'mI don't have a recommendation but I <br />will say that I'm starting to lean toward allowing the commission to make that decision. <br />MS. DE SOTO: So, I agree with that but I'm wondering if it wouldn't also still be benefit—and <br />although, from the information that's been given, I understand that they are taking so many <br />different factors into consideration in their own decision-making process. <br />But I think it would be of benefit to emphasize the factors that we find are key as the Merit <br />Appeals Board because, I think, Gay—or Gabe, you mentioned there are some unique things <br />about what our HR department has gone through and what has been requested of our director in <br />the last few years that could that others may not necessarily be aware of. <br />And so, I agree, I'm uncomfortable giving a number as wellI have no experience to anything <br />in this realm but I would like to advocate that it's equitable with the counties, not just for <br />equitability reasons but also because we need—we have been having this huge issue in our <br />counties of sustaining employees and recruiting employees. And as we're going through a <br />recruitment process now, this would make a big difference if we could truly say that our director <br />receives an equitable or competitive wage. <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.