Laserfiche WebLink
MAYNEW: Oh, sorry. <br />ALAMEDA: Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, sir. <br />ALAMEDA: Just maybe a compromise. I’m wondering if we just can admit the letter <br />and exclude the email. I mean the email is kind of an excerpt from the letter, too, so -. <br />KAISER: The email is the minutes that led to the decision in the motion. <br />ALAMEDA: I was just thinking, Mr. Chair, it’s easier to just accept this as evidence <br />since it’s here than the minutes. <br />WOODWARD: Well, evidently there was no discussion about admitting that, nobody had <br />an objection. And -. <br />IWASHITA: So for the record, the letter is in, the letter dated August 26, 2008 from <br />Paradise -? <br />WOODWARD: There was no objection so that will be admitted, yes. All right, <br />IWASHITA: What is the ruling on the partial minutes? <br />WOODWARD: Well, we have an objection and you either have to get the complete <br />minutes and delay this decision -. <br />CAMPBELL: Just go ahead and accept it, please. I’m not objecting. I withdraw. <br />WOODWARD: All right. So you have no objection then to this except? <br />CAMPBELL: No. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, then they will both be admitted as evidence. All right, any other <br />questions for -? <br />IWASHTIA: Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: I had brought up, there have been references to the Paradise Park Master <br />Plan and I guess a portion of it was read in. So I guess my next question is whether or not the <br />Master Plan should be part of the record in this case, well, in part because it has been referred to <br />and it’s the basis for the Board’s decision that objects to the granting of this particular tutoring <br />center. <br />TORIGOE: Mr. Chairman, it’s within your prerogative. Your Rule 4-18 (j) says, “At <br />the hearing, the presiding officer may require the production of further evidence upon any issue.” <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />23 <br /> <br />