2008-09-04 TCAMPBELL - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MAYHEW: I’m Suzanne Mayhew. I am at HC 3, Box 11000 in Keaau 96749. I’m here to represent the Hawaiian Paradise Park. We sent a letter, I’m not sure if you all got it. I know Norman didn’t get his until maybe a few hours ago. And what it has is the motion that was passed by the Board of Directors. And it’s kind of unclear, so I’m here to clarify anything you want on that. It goes on and on, and it’s still kind of vague. So, and I couldn’t change it because it was the motion. But I do want to, you know, answer any questions that have come up from that. I don’t know if you all have a copy of it. WOODWARD: We have. MAYHEW: Okay. Basically what they’re saying is, yeah, our kids do need help. They need tutoring centers, they need more schools, they need everything.But between the Master Plan that they’ve been working so hard on and their new traffic and safety committee doing traffic counts and the like, they didn’t want to, what’s the word, not approve -. WOODWARD: Endorse? MAYHEW: Thank you, this particular tutoring center because of those reasons. So if you have any questions about this very vague motion I’m here to answer those. WOODWARD: All right. Commissioners, any questions? IWASHITA: I do, Mr. Chair. WOODWARD: Commissioner Iwashita. IWASHITA: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you for coming, Ms. Mayhew. I guess my th reading of this is that, this is referring to the August 26 report of the Board’s action, it is that this proposed tutoring center does not conform with the Master Plan. And so I take that as an objection basically to approval of the special permit. MAYHEW: That is the Board’s standing on this. IWASHITA: Okay. We have, and I guess to clarify on the record first. Is this August 26, 2008 letter signed by Suzanne Mayhew from Hawaiian Paradise Park Owners Association part of the record in this case? Is it yes? WOODWARD: I believe it is, I have so many letters here. IWASHITA: No, I have one. I just want to make sure that all the parties agree that it is part of the record, or it’s clear that it is part of the record. TORIGOE: It’s not an exhibit per se. In a contested case hearing if someone wants to make it so, you know, that can be moved on. It is part of the correspondence that was received by the Commission for that, you know, for the purposes of this hearing. IWASHITA: Okay, so I think it should be made part of the record. So how is that accomplished? EXHIBIT B 4