My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-09-04 TNORTH KOHALA CDP
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-09-04 TNORTH KOHALA CDP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:10:41 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:10:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
$100,000 lot now you’re only left to put your house in the depression. Well, you don’t <br />want to do that so you go around to sell it. It’s worth what now? Fifty thousand dollars. <br />Well, it’s not a taking, but where did that $50,000 go? You know -. <br />I tried to cite a specific example but I don’t want to lose -. My overall testimony is please <br />consider adding a landowner’s input to cultural assessments, please consider taking out <br />the long-term list that’s going to create more problems legally for everybody than it <br />gains, and I’m on record with grave concerns about the Sunshine Law. Thank you for <br />allowing me to speak this long. <br />WOODWARD: Thank you, sir. Do we have any questions or comments? <br />LUCE: I’m asking for a consideration of two nonsubstantive changes. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, sir. <br />DOMINGO: I think those concerns are valid. <br />WOODWARD: Well, yes, let me ask Mr. Torigoe if he feels they’re <br />nonsubstantive. This is the thing we get ourselves into. <br />TORIGOE: Well, I’d like to, I guess, have a specific, you know, motion or <br />something to that, or suggestion to look at. <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair? <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Iwashita. <br />IWASHITA: As to the concern raised about on page 37, Chapter 4, Strategy 1.7, <br />I believe what’s being asked for in that particular instance is a language clarification. <br />And I move to add to the current language, which is “All steps should be done in <br />consultation with the community scientists, natural resource managers and” cultural <br />groups, no, “cultural experts,” boy, I can be creative in how I read -. To add after the <br />word community “(including affected landowners)”, to address, to make it clear that <br />community would include landowners affected by any cultural designation. <br />WOODWARD: All right, Mr. Torigoe, do you feel that is a substantive change or <br />not, or just clarification? <br />TORIGOE: You know, I could see that falling into the category of <br />clarification, if that’s consistent with what the Steering Committee had in mind. I would <br />also defer to the Planning Director, really. <br />WOODWARD: Mr. Yuen? <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.