My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-04 TCOHfire
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-09-04 TCOHfire
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:15:33 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:15:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
impact. But when you find a doctor who questions especially, you know, the cancer growth rate <br />in a particular area leaves you to think what may have caused that, you see. And I think that’s <br />what I’m hearing today. <br />You know, you people on the staff and the Commission know that I had not been a strong <br />advocate for cellular towers. In fact, I questioned it and often times I have voted against it. So, <br />it’s because of the underlying reasons that I have and doubts that I have. But I have never used <br />that reasoning as a means to speak against cellular towers. Thank you. <br />WOODWARD: All right, thank you. Any further questions? Commissioner Ogata <br />OGATA: Okay. I think that there’s no question that the community has an issue <br />with the fire facilities and the services. You know, the community does need services. <br />However, I think I asked you a question earlier about what was done to engage the community in <br />the planning and design phase of this project. And other than the door to door canvassing and <br />maybe some letters being sent out there really hasn’t been a forum other than this setting, which I <br />don’t feel is maybe the best setting for the community to have an opportunity to sit together as a <br />group with the designers and planners to try to come up with some solutions. So, at this point, <br />and I realize that a lot of money has already been spent. But for the benefit of proper planning, <br />do you have any idea on whether or not you’d be able to do some community planning and <br />community organizing to get some input from them? Because I really do believe, my personal <br />philosophy is that if there’s an issue that needs to be addressed the community can be your <br />biggest ally or your biggest enemy, and the community has the answers. We just need to get that <br />information and put that, you know, information together. So do you have any idea on whether <br />or not you’d be able to proceed in some way where you can get this to happen? <br />OLIVEIRA: I will make sure I answer this and my attorney can slap me if I say <br />something that’s not appropriate. But I think we have the opportunity to still meet with the <br />community and consider changes, consider accommodations. I think what was said in one of the <br />opening comments about the tower, a study still needs to be conducted on whether or not the <br />height or even the tower is necessary to even begin with it. It’s being put into the plans. But one <br />of the actual site study that needs to be done to assure we have the line of sight communication <br />capabilities, that study has not been completed yet. So I couldn’t tell you for sure that the tower <br />is necessary, what that height will have to be. But I think in hearing the sentiments of the <br />community, it’s important that we do consider changes, accommodations, and assurances. As <br />Mr. Okuda, he said it best, the Fire Department, our mission is to save and protect lives; and we <br />don’t want to do something that is counter to that mission and purpose. <br />What I can do is go back to my boss, the Mayor, the administration, Corporation Counsel, <br />Planning Department, those agencies that regulate the process, and see what still can be done and <br />what doors are still open and assure the community we’ll do that. I agree and apologize if we <br />didn’t do a good job in the beginning with engaging the community, we just used the normal <br />processes that government uses which is the environmental assessment process or venues like <br />this. And I think it’s a lesson learned that we can do a better job of engaging the community <br />sooner to, one is put them at ease but also get their input and comment.So I think the door is <br />still open for discussion on the plans and design. I think it’s also important to note that we don’t <br />16 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.