My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-04 TCOHfire
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-09-04 TCOHfire
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:15:33 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:15:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
heard, we’re just trying to do the best thing; and it’s not the easiest thing for us to do. So I just <br />wanted to throw that out there, that I think it’s very important to have a project like this. I think <br />efficiency is the key to saving us, one, taxpayer money and saving more lives. And I think <br />everybody agrees with that. It’s more of a comment. Thanks. <br />WOODWARD: Thank you, Commissioner Kern. Commissioner Ogata. <br />OGATA: Can I make a motion? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, you may. <br />OGATA: After all of that, I move that with regards to special permit application SPP <br />09-84 be approved by the Planning Commission. <br />WOODWARD: With the addition of the -? <br />OGATA: With the additional condition. And, right, can you read that? <br />GONZALEZ: Approved, based on the Planning Director’s recommendation and <br />proposed conditions and including the additional condition as follows: “The applicant shall <br />make a concerted effort to work with the public, the designers, the builders, architects to address <br />the concerns raised by the public.” <br />WOODWARD: Okay, very good. Do we have a second? <br />ISHIBASHI: Second. <br />WOODWARD: All right. I would just like to say, now that I can kind of give my two <br />cents worth, clearly this is a project the community needs. There’s no doubt. And I think <br />everybody is in agreement there. We need a fire, we need a command center for fire and police. <br />I think the Department has bent over backwards to try and be as accommodating as possible and <br />still provide for the public safety and welfare. In fact, I think you’ve gone farther than really is <br />required in some respects, and I do salute you for that. But I think given the assurances that <br />you’re willing to discuss community concerns, from your past performance, I think that makes <br />me happy. I’m fine with that; and I plan on supporting the measure. Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As indicated, the main issue here today, aside <br />from the little other issues, the issue is on the cellular tower. Now if I’m certain that after they <br />meet and everything and there’s a decision to relocate the cellular tower is made to accommodate <br />the concerns of the people, then I would say yes, I would vote, I would vote for this measure at <br />this time. But not knowing that and knowing that there might also be a possibility, strong <br />possibility, that they might just say okay, you know, after we spoke with them and they heard <br />their concerns, we still need this tower location to be here -- because of perhaps the studies that <br />still need to come and the studies that need to be performed as to show where is the best location <br />for the placement to the tower – okay, if that decision is made that the location that you folks are <br />deciding to put it is the most appropriate place then, you know, we would not have accomplish <br />23 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.