My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2009-09-04 TCOHfire
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2009
>
2009-09-04 TCOHfire
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:15:33 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:15:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
OLIVEIRA: And just to , I guess, clarify further what Mr. Brilhante was saying, I think <br />what’s important is we need to sit down with the consultant to see whether or not the tower has <br />to be in the dispatch center, everything has to be on that site.We haven’t had the opportunity to <br />discuss the concerns of the community with the consultant to see what work arounds or what <br />solutions might be available and doable, and still maintain putting together a communications <br />center. So I think it’s affording all of us the opportunity to find those solutions. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Any further discussion? Okay. And it sounds to me from the <br />testimony that this proposal without the ability to have a radio tower is next to worthless. So I <br />would have to vote against this amendment. And I do think that the community input certainly is <br />important. And we’ve heard that the Fire Department is honestly interested in getting public <br />input prior to placement of a wireless or a radio antenna. But I think if we tie, if we tie them up <br />on this one the whole thing is moot, to be honest with you. Did you still want to go ahead with <br />your amendment? <br />DOMINGO: Well, you know, assuming that the amendment is approved then it <br />behooves the administration to really sit down and find some other location within the premises <br />itself. And I’m aware of the fact that, you know, it has to be there. By no means am I saying <br />that it’s my way or no way. I have, I’m a reasonable person. I can understand and I can even <br />negotiate to such an extent. But, you know, what I’m trying to say, and it’s something that I <br />have always said in the past when we come across this kind of issue, is how, how does the <br />people feel in the area where something is done that would impact upon them negatively. That’s <br />my concern, you know. And if I sense that the people have that strong feeling and the concern, <br />then you know, it’s my tendency to not rush into it but let’s see what we can do. you know, talk <br />story, come to some kind of a decision and make everybody happy, you know, what we say <br />hooponopono. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, thank you. Do we have any further discussion on the amendment? <br />Okay, seeing none, let’s, if you’ll state the amendment and we’ll vote on the amendment, Jeff. <br />DARROW: Okay, Mr. Chairman, the motion before us, we have two motions, the <br />original motion which is to approve with the added condition, and we have an amendment to the <br />original motion which is to remove the radio tower from the request for the original motion. <br />With that I’ll take -. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. Well, we’ll vote on the amendment, we have to vote on the <br />amendment first. So -. <br />DARROW: Correct. So we’ll be taking a vote on the amendment to the original <br />motion. With that I’ll take the roll. Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: Aye. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Kern? <br />KERN: Aye. <br />27 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.