Laserfiche WebLink
DARROW:There is a lanai that goes around the actual building, so the <br />entrance to the bathrooms would be from the lanai area. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay, but it’s basically from the outside. It’s for the public’s use? <br />DARROW:It appears so. It looks like the actual layout will be that these are <br />sliding doors so there will be an open, large opening here, large opening here and a large <br />opening here, and this would be an open area with the kitchen area. And then, again, <br />somebody could just go right out of the open area around to the rear of the building. <br />SIRACUSA:Okay, well, I was asking because of the, they’re talking about a <br />proposed cesspool and they’re projecting 30 to 40 customers a day plus a certified <br />kitchen. And if they’re allowing two bathrooms to be used by the public, that looks to <br />me like they’re going to be generating the amount that would put them into the septic <br />category, as far as the Department of Health and EPA’s rules are concerned. So that’s <br />why I was asking, because two bathrooms open to public would generate much more <br />water use. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner McCall and then Commissioner Iwashita? <br />MCCALL:Jeff, what is the, or maybe for Mr. Torigoe. What is the, if this <br />was a produce stand selling farm produce just from the farm, what are the requirements? <br />Would they need a use permit at that point or -? <br />DARROW:This would be a permitted use in the Agricultural District if it was <br />a small roadside stand that was specifically to sell items grown on the property. <br />MCCALL:But what they’re talking about with certified kitchen, and nursery <br />stock, and other things that are coming from elsewhere, it puts it beyond that? <br />DARROW:Correct. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have a question about the comment in the <br />Recommendation about this proposal taxing the, or taxing public facilities. When I went <br />through the application, you know, the Police Department, Department of Transportation <br />and Public Works, none of them opposed the project. They all, Police Department says <br />they don’t anticipate any significant impact to traffic or public safety concerns. <br />Transportation says we just want to look at the plans and make sure that they have an <br />opportunity to review it, make recommendations and place conditions; basically the same <br />thing for Public Works. So is there something I didn’t see in the material that the <br />Director’s comments were based on? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Darrow? Is that a -? <br />EXHIBIT C <br />3 <br /> <br />