My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-07 TTAKASE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-09-07 TTAKASE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:17:29 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:17:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:Yes, I was wondering if Mr. Torigoe could give us some guidance about <br />wording for that particular concern about keeping it in student housing? <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Let’s see, well, I need a couple of minutes to consult with staff and see, <br />you know, how that might be done. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Any other questions? Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Maybe just a point of discussion here. I’m not sure I would support <br />having something put on here to make it exclusively for student housing. I mean, I think it <br />would be desirable as student housing simply based upon its location next to the University. But <br />anything that improves, that gives multiple housing, I mean, improves the housing situation in <br />Hilo is going to improve the situation for student housing. I don’t see that we should be tying <br />these guys down to being only for student housing. I’m also not, this would be something from <br />Mr. Torigoe, but I’m also not sure that legally we can do that, whether that would be <br />discrimination or, you know, that type of thing. <br />ALAMEDA:I think, I have a contrary opinion but I want to save it for our discussion. I <br />think probably Commissioner Salavea also would like to chip in on that, too. <br />SALAVEA:I’ll save it for discussion. <br />ALAMEDA:All right. Thank you. You have anything else? <br />SIRACUSA:Yeah. Well, there was something in this morning’s paper about the <br />County Council is going to be considering creating a new zoning designation, “University area” <br />or something like that; and that zoning in that area surrounding the University would have, be for <br />all sorts of subsidiary uses that would pertain to the University situation. And, so, it seems to me <br />that if that sort of thing passes, then Mr. McCall’s concern about it being discriminatory would <br />not hold. If the idea of building it there, it’s my impression, is because of its relative proximity <br />to the University, other affordable multi-family housing could be elsewhere. But students, a lot <br />of them don’t have cars, they have to walk or bicycle, so you look for spaces that are close to the <br />University to fill that need. <br />ALAMEDA:We can talk more in discussion, thank you, about that issue. How about <br />questions for our Applicant’s representative or Applicant directly? Mr. Fuke, would you like to <br />add anything before we see if there’s any testimony? <br />FUKE:Well, I think that, you know, the affordable housing requirement -. You <br />know, I think that some of the Commissioners may recall the Puaa-Suffolk project, which was <br />like a 200-unit rental housing project. And what happened there is ultimately the County <br />Council had required that the area be set aside for rental, you know, for a minimum of 20 years; <br />and that was made part and parcel of the condition. And whether you can, you know, maybe that <br />might be a little bit more appropriate rather than saying that you can, you know, you should be <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.