2006-09-07 TTAKASE - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

traditional student but is more transitioning from either unstable environment to more stable. This can serve that dual purpose also. That’s how I see it. Thank you, Mr. Chair. ALAMEDA:Okay. I’ll put in my two cents. Now is the time. What attracted me to this application is student housing, first and foremost. What also attracted me to this application is the support letter by the University suggesting that they do have a need. So, and I think I’m aware of previous projects in the past that were, I guess, sold as student housing but turned into non-student housing; and then our students get kind of left out again. And our University is growing and, so, a part of me wants to insure that this is earmarked for student housing. I understand what Commissioner Salavea is suggesting that there may be periods of vacancy; but, you know, I think if you want to go that way then, to me, it’s like, you know, you’re taking away the whole student housing sale, which is what’s attracting me to this application. So a part of me wants to see it remain student housing; and let the University and the Applicant kind of deal with the vacancies during the slow periods. And I also understand the need for affordable housing, too. But in this particular case, this is earmarked for a particular group of, a particular community; and that’s our students. So, I don’t know, I’m a little bit torn. Commissioner McCall? MCCALL:Just comments. I echo Commissioner Salavea’s ideas that we really shouldn’t be limiting this. I think if we’re going to try and limit it to student housing, I mean, are we going to make the judgment we’re talking full-time students, talking part-time students, are we going to kick somebody out as soon as they graduate, and -? I mean, to me, I don’t think that really should be our mission here. I think purely by the fact that it is right near the University that in all probability it’s going to be primarily student housing. And just thinking about my experiences from a few years ago, if you are in primarily student housing, it is going to be probably not that attractive to, you know, non-student housing, I mean, just because of the situation that students are in. But I don’t feel that we should be limited to that and we shouldn’t be, you know, kicking someone who just graduated and got a wife and a kid and, you know, needs to stay there for a few years before he can get on his feet and move out, or something like that. I think just the proximity will pretty much guarantee that it should be primarily student housing. ALAMEDA:All right. Commissioner Iwashita and then Commissioner Siracusa. IWASHITA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. I also support the concept of providing more housing opportunities for students. And I think just the way our community is growing and the college is growing that this proposal, as a matter of fact, presents additional housing opportunities for students. I want to make a record, though. I have my concern that, you know, the process that we’re going through right now is not the proper process for having this and other zoning changes made. I’d like to take this opportunity to make a record of what the General Plan requires and what I think needs to be done before zoning changes like these are approved. The General Plan adopted at the beginning of last year provides for planned implementation under 15.1 Community Development Plans. EXHIBIT A 7