Laserfiche WebLink
SIRACUSA: And can one drive then from one lot to the other without going out <br />onto the street? <br />DARROW: That’s what the proposal is. This is Lehua Lane. On your location <br />map this would be Lehua Lane, this would be Keaka Parkway. This is the Highway. The <br />proposal is to come from the Highway and turn into the first lot, the lot to the east, and <br />then be able to access all lots from that one access location; and that’s identified in this <br />area on the site plan. If you’ll notice on this particular site plan there is something here, a <br />causeway, but I’m not sure exactly what that is. But this appears to be the proposed <br />access for all these particular properties. <br />SIRACUSA: Okay. I thought at first there was and then I went up and I looked <br />and I saw the way the plantings were indicated. It doesn’t look like there’s, you’d have <br />to drive right over a tree or a hedge or something. <br />GRAHAM: My preference is we don’t get too deep into the details of the <br />application until we decide if we’re going to continue it; and if we’re continuing it, let’s <br />get into it the next time when we kind of take action. But first I think I’d like to hear -. <br />Are there any questions for Jeff at this point? First, maybe I’d like to hear from the <br />applicant, and right away want to know whether you’re okay with us doing a continuance <br />or whether there’s a problem with that. First let me swear you in. <br />FOULK: Sure. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, do you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter before <br />the Planning Commission today? <br />FOULK: I do. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, and could you give your name and address, please. <br />FOULK: My name is William C. Foulk, 75-5656 Kuakini Highway, Suite <br />301, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. And go ahead and address the continuance issue or <br />anything else you feel appropriate at this time. <br />FOULK: Yeah, you know, we’re happy with the continuance. We generated <br />a traffic impact analysis report. Unfortunately, the figures we got from DOT were from <br />October and so they were about 8 months old when we generated the report. They say <br />that the law states that it has to be six months or less, so we’re using newer numbers now. <br />And we’re also opening the dialogue with DOT to figure out the nature of the <br />improvements they want at the intersections so we can include those in the report and in <br />this application. <br /> EXHIBIT C <br />7 <br /> <br />