Laserfiche WebLink
Thank you, <br /> Maija <br /> Hi Richard- <br /> I am glad to hear you are working on securing a second highway access with DOT. There is still some confusion <br /> about the second intersection referenced in the record. Your first map shows the second intersection that was <br /> required in Condition L is the Kuakini Highway/Queen Kaahumanu intersection. But I could not find anything in <br /> the record indicating Gamrex provided lands and funds for this intersection and that this is the intersection <br /> referenced in the condition. Perhaps you can point me to it. <br /> The LUC and Rezone files indicate a second access point to the property was permitted by DOT and the maps <br /> confirm 'access permitted' north of the drainage way on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. From the 1983 rezone <br /> background report: "Access to the property from Kuakini Highway extension (this section is called Queen <br /> Kaahumanu Highway today)will be permitted from two points. One would be Lako Street intersection which is <br /> planned...... The other access point would be to the north in the vicinity of the Horseshoe Bend stream and will <br /> have a right-of-way width of fifty feet. Both roads will be built to County dedicable standards." <br /> This description matches up with the original rezone map exhibit that I sent to you in the last email. This info <br /> seems to confirm that Condition L envisioned the second intersection on the Kuakini Highway extension would <br /> be on the north side of the property and built to County standards with a 50-foot wide right-of-way heading <br /> east into the project site. I've also attached info and maps from the 1993 LUC Order file which confirms a <br /> second access intersection was proposed in this vicinity to provide direct access into the RM-zoned lands. <br /> Please share with us if you are able to find information in the files or in your records that indicates the second <br /> intersection referenced in the condition was the Kuakini Highway/Queen Kaahumanu intersection rather than <br /> the one referenced above. We are just trying to confirm whether the second access from highway is <br /> mandatory per the ordinance and record. <br /> Any info you can provide would be helpful to clear this up. Let me know if you have any questions. <br /> Maija <br /> From: Richard Wheelock [mailto:Richard@eastwestrealty.org] <br /> Sent:Thursday,July 25, 2019 2:42 PM <br /> 5 <br />