Laserfiche WebLink
A much better and the safest street would be Liholiho Place. A very short dead end street that only has five <br /> driveways all with a clear view. Also a better view up and down Lako. The applicants own the property <br /> between the dead end street and the project so it isn't a problem. <br /> Doesn't follow the County's plan of Mauka to Makai roads which is extremely important in emergencies such as <br /> fire, earthquake, etc, connect with I'O place at the top. All roads in there complete project needs to be County <br /> roads. No Private Gates blocking roads in there project. <br /> Asking for a 10 year permit extension is ridiculous being so much changes during that time. I haven't heard of <br /> any buildings the applicants have ever built. Who's going to build it? The scared land would just sit there until <br /> they can sell it to some builder. <br /> No significant work was ever done for over 20 plus years so what makes anyone think it can be done now. No <br /> significant work was ever done when a permit was in place and the permit was extended several times. Because <br /> the move of business being built north this plan should be moved north for job housing. <br /> Drainage is a major factor now so adding these ugly monster structures (200 feet X 200 feet X 40+foot tall) <br /> and roads will dramatically increase runoff and flooding in the lower areas. If you look at the FEMA flood map, <br /> most of this property should be unbuildable. We just have major flooding of Kuakini last month and last week <br /> which closed the road. <br /> The blocking of views of existing homes is also major factor along with decreased values looking at these out of <br /> place monster structures. Height limit of 25 feet! Should be enforced. <br /> The land has proven to have major Pre and Post contact artifacts. Only one small area of 5 acres was lightly <br /> probed with a shovel finding some significant finds. This must be explored fully before any permitting. <br /> It appears the consultant just passed off the threatened and endangered specs. We know and see the hawks and <br /> Pueo (owls) there. The Pueo nest in or on the ground and live in lower trees. These animals do live and hunt this <br /> property. It doesn't appear they did any sound testing for the Hoary bats. That was brought out in the first <br /> environmental report that testing needed to be done at a certain time of year. The giant moth is another one that <br /> needs more work in finding true answers. The number 1 threats to the above specs is collision with man- made <br /> structures/buildings, loss of habitat/tree cover. Also the high potential of shore bird kills hitting the glass or <br /> structures. Facts that the consultant missed, Pueo (owls) have nest scrapes in or on the ground and up to 10 <br /> feet off the ground. Hoary bats nest usually 8 to 16 feet off the ground feeding in areas of foliage. This needs to <br /> be really studied along with the Giant Moth. The consultant missed everything including National trails. <br /> 2 <br />