My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 tmalian
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 tmalian
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:20:10 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:20:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FUJIKAWA:Wait there a second. Okay, you want to raise your right hand? Do <br />you swear or affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the Hawaii County <br />Planning Commission? <br />HA:I do. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay. You may be seated. State your name and your address, <br />please? <br />th <br />HA:My name, Matthew Ha. My address is 847 7 Avenue, Honolulu, <br />Hawaii 96816. My home number is 739-1475. <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay, you may proceed with your testimony. <br />HA:Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and the panel members for moving my <br />agenda. I have to catch a flight. And this is relatively new for me, so please bear witness <br />to my problems here. <br />I have submitted a written testimony to the members. So rather than run through the <br />whole thing which everybody would just be reading on, IÓll try and make it very brief on <br />my basic statements. <br />Basically, this land that my family owns is sitting on the northern border of Mr. MalianÓs <br />property. Our tax map key is 7-03-05-003, and is presently surrounded by several other <br />undeveloped properties. We really donÓt mean to portray us as being anti-development, <br />we are not so much in dispute for this project. Our only concern is with the present <br />layout of the project, we see our property being land-locked without access, okay? <br />Basically, when I talked to several people about this, including Mr. Sidney Fuke, he gave <br />me several alternatives that were supposed to remedy the situation. The problem with <br />that is presently thereÓs a 20-foot easement that runs approximately 2,400 feet long <br />connecting to the main highway. Now, according to the County standards, this 20-foot <br />easement is serving approximately three to four different landowners. In essence, if I was <br />to take access on that 20-foot right-of-way, IÓm looking at a 20-foot wide, 2,400-foot <br />driveway. Now the driveway is insufficient, according to the County standards, for any <br />kind of two-way traffic because IÓm serving several different property owners. Also, <br />because IÓm in that situation there, any kind of emergency vehicle or public utilities <br />would have to go down that easement, and that 20-foot wide easement is very <br />insufficient. If the County was to make it standard, a minimum size road would be 50 <br />feet of right-of-way, which means, basically, the County would have to get 15 feet on <br />each side of that easement. <br />My family has had this property for approximately 1950 on and ha <br />gain access to the property. I believe that the subdivision presently surrounding the <br />property was built; and due to some unfortunate circumstances, we were never able to <br />establish any kind of access. <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.