My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 tmalian
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 tmalian
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:20:10 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:20:07 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HA:I do not. I have physically gone out there in June and saw t <br />of the lots next to our border has been cleared and grubbed. I believe, according to my <br />survey map, that physically, that government road terminates at <br />Unit on somebodyÓs property. So, in other words, that government road that theyÓre <br />looking at, I believe, it goes north and just terminates at somebodyÓs property line. As far <br />as physical features go, I did not see that road physically out there when I went out to <br />check the site. <br />YUEN:Just for the sake of the Commission, our current conditions <br />recommended conditions of approval say that the Applicant shall construct at least one <br />connection to the north and one to the south. <br />FUJIKAWA:You understand that, Mr. Ha? <br />HA:Yes, I do. But is it possible to connect the south to the existing <br />government road and the north to my southern border? <br />FUJIKAWA:Planning Director? <br />YUEN:You know, this is hard to work out right here because IÓm not sure <br />of the terrain and what had happened in the subdivision. If they did build it, this one, it <br />would be, instead of being 2,500 feet from the road, itÓd be 300 feet from the road, which <br />has -. <br />HA:That is correct, except I would have to use that 20-foot wide <br />easement; and in order for me to qualify that easement to become a County specified <br />road, I would have to somehow acquire 15 feet on each side of it <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead, Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:I just want to clarify where weÓre at. IÓm not sure, but it seems to <br />me that Mr. Fuke has suggested that, you know, heÓs amenable to <br />happen, but that itÓll, the location of a north-south road will come about in discussions <br />with Public Works and with the County when theyÓre further down stream. And, so, itÓs <br />not something he can guarantee at this point. Other than Mr. Ha sort of bringing it to us <br />at this point, with us maybe having discretion to make some kind of recommendation or <br />requirement, that it do suffice to do the access that he wants -. So thatÓs really kind of the <br />issue before us that we, do we affirmatively make any statement about how we wish it to <br />be worked out? Am I reading the sense of whatÓs going on correctly? <br />HA:Basically, yes. The way I look at it, itÓs a matter of what is there <br />and what is actually there. When you look at the layout on the plans, thereÓs a whole lot <br />of accesses; but you actually physically go out there, itÓs very incomplete. We, like I <br />said, weÓve had this land since 1950. Throughout all those years weÓve never had a <br />chance to gain access from the County, whether it be being out of the loop in meetings, <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.