My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
#2 OPSD Cumulative Impact Guidance
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2023
>
2023-10-19 Leeward CANCELED
>
Planning Director's Report
>
#2 OPSD Cumulative Impact Guidance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 10:10:01 AM
Creation date
10/9/2023 10:17:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
include effects that are later in time or farther removed in distance from the <br />proposed action or alternatives. (40 CFR §1508.1) <br />Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) Chapter 11-200.1 under the HEPA, HRS Chapter <br />343, continues the requirement of cumulative effects/impacts assessment, and defines <br />Cumulative impact as "the impact on the environment that results from the incremental <br />impact of the action when added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future <br />actions regardless of what agency or person undertakes other actions. " All EAs/EISs are <br />supposed to provide cumulative impact assessments for their proposed actions. <br />According to the CEQ handbook on Considering Cumulative Effects under the National <br />Environmental Policy Act (CEQ, 1997), the primary purpose of cumulative effects/impacts <br />analysis is to determine the magnitude and significance of the environmental consequences <br />of a proposed action in the context of cumulative effects of other past, present, and future <br />actions. Significance of cumulative effects/impacts depends on how they compare with the <br />environmental baseline and relevant resource threshold such as regulatory standards. <br />Cumulative effects are usually categorized into eight scenarios for assessment as follows <br />(CEQ, 1997): <br />1) time crowding — effects of frequent and repetitive actions on the environment; <br />2) time lags — delayed effects of a proposed action; <br />3) space crowding — effects of spatial density on the environment; <br />4) cross -boundary — effects occurring away from the source; <br />5) fragmentation — effects or changes in landscape pattern; <br />b) compounding effects — effects arising from multiple pathways; <br />7) indirect effects — secondary effects; and <br />8) triggers or thresholds — effects defined by agency laws, policies or regulations. <br />3. Principles of cumulative effects/impacts assessment <br />Analyzing cumulative effects/impacts is challenging, primarily because of the difficulty of <br />defining the geographic (spatial) and time (temporal) boundaries. No single formula is <br />available for determining an appropriate scope and extent of a cumulative impact analysis. <br />However, Guidance for Preparers of Cumulative Impact Analysis — Approach and <br />Guidance (Caltrans, 2005) states that the following principles have gained a general <br />acceptance: <br />1) Cumulative effects are caused by the aggregate of past, present, and reasonably <br />foreseeable future actions. <br />2) Cumulative effects are the total effect, including both direct and indirect effects, on <br />a given resource, ecosystem, and human community of all actions taken, no matter <br />who has taken the actions. <br />3) Cumulative effects need to be analyzed in terms of the specific resource, <br />ecosystem, and human community being affected. <br />4) It is not practical to analyze the cumulative effects of an action on the universe, and <br />the list of environmental effects must focus on those that are truly meaningful. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.