My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 tpuaanui
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 tpuaanui
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:20:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:20:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:While I commend the ApplicantÓs representative and the Director <br />for the initiative on this, itÓs just that the trail isnÓt contained only on this property. So the <br />issue of the trail, whether as an access-way or historic site, presumably continues beyond <br />the boundaries of this property; and we may hear of it again and take it up under other <br />applications. And I noticed that State Historic Preservation Division signed off that no <br />historic sites would be impacted by this undertaking, and there hasnÓt been a discussion <br />of the trail as a historic site. But does this record, the record of this proceeding then <br />constitute that discussion of the trail as a historic site? <br />FUJIKAWA:Okay, any other? <br />KUBOTA:ThatÓs a question she posed. <br />YUEN:Let me make a suggestion. Maye we can do this on the staff <br />If we would write a letter to the Na Ala Hele Program asking them, enclosing Ms. InabaÓs <br />letter in that, and asking them for a letter we believe this is <br />would look into why it was removed from the tax maps and possibly re-enter it on the tax <br />maps. At this point, to figure out the legal status of a trail like this is a, it can be a major <br />undertaking and require abstracting. We donÓt have it, the staff to do that in the Planning <br />Department. Na Ala Hele Program has somebody assigned to do tha <br />do that or not, I donÓt know. But thatÓs really, I think, the best thing to do right now. If <br />itÓs erroneously, the problem is that once itÓs removed from the tax -, people tend to rely <br />on the tax maps, they, for all kinds of information. And, so, w <br />removed from the tax maps -. Although it may be on an early tax <br />the drawer, itÓs not a new tax map, people gradually forget and you lose any indication <br />that this is, there is a trail here. So, there may have been a good reason, there may have <br />been, it may have been purchased out. Something else like that might have happened. <br />But I think this is the best way to investigate this, and see whether it should be re-entered <br />onto the tax maps. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Very good. Any other question from the Commission? <br />KUBOTA:I had a question -. <br />FUJIKAWA:Commissioner Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:That I wanted to ask. So the status of Condition L stands for this <br />application only, is that my understanding? <br />YUEN:Yes. We canÓt, without knowing what the legal rights are, I canÓt <br />say they should keep it -. <br />KUBOTA:Yes, I understand. <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.