2003-09-11 tpuaanui - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

SPRINGER:I sometimes have shared Mrs. KubotaÓs concern that we receive agency comments and they may be outside of the scope of the particular request which is before us and that, especially if IÓm reading the material prior to coming to the table, I come with one set of expectations and they may not be properly met at this time under this application. And I guess itÓs a good thing when they present to us that sort of detail, and then the staff here from the Planning Department can help us applicability of those comments to the particular request. But I sometimes have a sense of confusion as well when I hear, see one agency making rather detail and specific recommendations and I donÓt find them reflected in the recommendation from Planning Department. FUJIKAWA:All right. Any other questions? If not, the ownerÓs representative, Mr. Fuke? You may proceed. FUKE:Hi, again. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Again, for the record name is Sidney Fuke. The ownerÓs representative is Thea Brown and sheÓs seated in the audience. The owner has had a chance to review the, the Applicant, rather, has had a chance to review the staffÓs Background Report and the Recommendations and has no objections to any one of them. I would like to note, however, just for the record that in the reference on the proposed ordinance, that bill, and I donÓt know if it needs to be corrected, but in the ordinance, thereÓs a reference to amending a portion of Parcel 10. What had happened was over the course, you know, the original parcel was designated 10, but then there was subsequent consolidation and re-subdivision. And so 10 was assigned to another parcel and the subject parcel is now Parcel 5. And I donÓt know whether that needed to be corrected or not. But itÓs really a minor thing but it could have some down-the-road kind of implications, because you donÓt want to have a property thatÓs zoned thatÓs not really intended to be zoned. I was involved in this project only in conjunction with the expansion of the B&B to the inn; and, so, as a result, when the owners asked me to do the time extension, I had elected to do that. But, at the same time, they also wanted to do the extension on the Change of Zone which I was not involved in. But I had to do quite a bit of research and, so, if you can bear it now, IÓll just give you some general background as far as like how this whole thing came into being. The property owner, itÓs basically the same property and essentially the same owners. But there was a reorganization of the ownership, the partnership; and, as a result, now you have some different members of the family thatÓs kind of doing this project. Back in October of 1997, a maximum of a 5-room bed and breakfast was app Planning Commission. And between September 1998 to April of 199 maybe I should back up, between September 19 - oh, IÓve got it a September 1988 to April 1991, they wanted to expand the bed and breakfast to an inn, put in 15 to 20 bungalows, restaurant, gallery, etc. over 14 acres o 6