My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 tpuaanui
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 tpuaanui
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:20:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:20:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The other question I think that you had raised, Commissioner Springer, you know, dealt <br />with this 12-foot wide trail. I do have a copy of a map that was prepared by Wes Thomas <br />Associates which showed an existing trail thatÓs 12 feet wide that abuts the north end of <br />the subject property. Why it wasnÓt picked up in that presentation map, I donÓt know. <br />But when Wes Thomas Associates prepared the rezoning exhibit, you know, for the <br />commercially-zoned area, they did reflect a 12-foot wide, the trail running mauka-makai. <br />Again, you know, the Applicant, you know, because you already ha <br />requirement of 20 feet because adjoining properties are zoned agricultural -. And, so, <br />based on the zoning ordinance, you have to respect the setback of the adjoining property <br />owners if itÓs less. So in this situation here, because itÓs agriculturally-zoned, the <br />required setback is 20 feet, you know, from any of the proposed <br />as a result, you know the trail, whether itÓs legal or otherwise, but weÓre conceding that it <br />is, it exists, would not be impeded by any of the proposed improvements. And if you <br />want a condition along that line, I do have a proposed condition <br />itÓs necessary. <br />FUJIKAWA:Is there any other questions from the Commission to the <br />ApplicantÓs representative? Go ahead, Commissioner Springer. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Fuke, do you anticipate that the Applicant will be conducting <br />any activities with or without the condition that would remove the trail from the <br />landscape? <br />FUKE:No. <br />SPRINGER:Does your proposed condition indicate the protective nature of <br />their intent? <br />FUKE:Well, what I was going to suggest was something along this line -. <br />Since the minimum setback requirements are already 20 feet, that <br />maintain a minimum setback of 20 feet along the north property line and there shall be no <br />other improvements, including landscaping, within 12 feet of the north property line.Ñ <br />ÒCause sometimes you can have landscaping within that area and that could impede the <br />flow. <br />SPRINGER:Jeff, could you point out where the trail alignment is on the map on <br />the wall? <br />DARROW:Sure. ItÓs identified along the northern boundary of this area here, <br />and it also runs up to Old Mamalahoa Highway, and continues down <br />SPRINGER:And is immediately adjacent, the boundary? ItÓs virtually on the <br />boundary? <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.