2003-09-11 tsoto911 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GRAHAM;Could you take a little bit more responsibility than what that sounds like to me in the sense of, that more than contact will be done. I mean, I certainly presume that sheÓs being truthful, and she said it was there, so, could you kind of involve, to the extent that you know that itÓd be looked at -? MOOERS:Well, what I think IÓm trying to say is that weÓve been put on notice that thereÓs people who believe thereÓs a burial on the site. Whether itÓs there now or not, we donÓt know; and thatÓs what we need to find out. And Dr. Rechtman to contact her and to try to do a site visit and see if he can explore the fact that there is or is not a burial that remains on the property today. GRAHAM:Fine, thank you. FUJIKAWA:Thank you. Is there any other question, Commissioners? I have a question with you, Mr. Mooers. On the Background Report, page 4 on the Police Department, ÐThe Applicant has failed to include sufficient information dealing with the access to Alii Drive.Ñ Can you explain to me on that? MOOERS:Certainly. There is no requirement in the SMA to provide access information like that. ThatÓs not part of the SMA approval process, which weÓve discussed before. The driveway access, again, will be part of the Plan Approval and the Director has the responsibility to make sure that that access is adequate for the site, including the comments that were made by the Department of Public Works. But if you look at the criteria in the application, the SMA, thereÓs not a section in there that really discusses traffic or for you to discuss, you know, any of those issues because itÓs not a criteria for granting a Special Management Area Permit. ItÓs a criteria for granting zoning. But all these issues of traffic and stuff are not discussed in the application because they are not SMA issues. FUJIKAWA:ThatÓs right. Thank you very much. Any other question from the Commissioners? Go ahead, Commissioner Kubota? KUBOTA:I donÓt know if this is appropriate to discuss this with the impending Contested Case; but if I am re-missed, then please let me know. My question is, there have been some reference to the easement as presented in our Background Report as being erroneous. I would like to have that issue clarified. And in conjunction with that, I have this, I received this letter from a Mr., I guess, itÓs a Mr. Mike Kniss about ownership of the area that is to be expanded, that is driveway, and that issue is in question. And I would like to know where we are on this issue. May I address it now or do I have to wait until we determine where this case is going to go? FUJIKAWA:Mr. Mooers, can you answer that concern of Commissioner Kubota? 19