My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:Is that approximately two acres? <br />OKANO:Yeah. <br />YUEN:Okay. Is it okay then to say an approximately two-acre portion of Phase <br />II of the park master plan? Is that agreeable -? <br />OKANO:That would be the entire Phase II. <br />YUEN:Okay. Thats agreeable to you guys? <br />KUBOTA:Yes, thats agreeable. Thank you. <br />YUEN:Okay.Thankyouverymuch. <br />GALDONES:Furthercomments,questions?Ms.Okano,thankyouforparticipatingand <br />I commend the work you folks have done. I appreciate that. Thanks. Miss Rohr, could you <br />please state your name and your residence address and then you may begin your testimony. <br />ROHR:Okay. Claudia Rohr, 369 Nene Street in Hilo. Im against the application <br />for the change in the State Land Use Boundary. <br />SIRACUSA:Excuse me, could you speak into the mike, please? <br />ROHR:What? <br />GALDONES:Could you speak into the mike, please. <br />SIRACUSA:Louder. <br />ROHR:Louder. Sorry, its very loud to me. I have a hearing problem. If <br />Commissioner Springer could move her mike closer, that would help me when you speak. <br />Thank you. <br />Okay. Im against the Land Use Boundary Amendment for this reason. Theres no purpose <br />given in asking for this amendment. They have no plans or use for the property particularly. <br />The reason that they justify it is theyre saying the items in B, under this application, will be <br />changed to residential, therefore, its some sort of trade. I say its no trade at all. Those items in <br />No. B had a purpose at one time. They were businesses within the camp that had been in this <br />area. There was a garage and, I think, a store; so those items were rezoned a particular way. Its <br />not convenient to their subdivision plan to have to deal with those zoning, so theyre saying they <br />would like to make it all residential, and I think that makes sense. But to say that they have some <br />sort of credit is not correct. When the camp was moved uphill to Kulaimano, they did create <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.