Laserfiche WebLink
public would like to continue to drive to the lighthouse, park, and access the beach off Aila Point <br />as they have for decades without harm to the Coast Guards light station equipment. <br />‚The Planning Commission is reviewing the developers application for an SMA Permit to <br />subdivide portion of,ƒ Im just going to say, I said portion of Parcel ‚01,ƒ but now its Lot 70, <br />‚surrounding the Coast Guards lighthouse parcel 13 tomorrowof which you should have <br />received notice. Continental Pacific, LLC has purchased and gated hundreds of acres around the <br />parcel owned by the Coast Guard causing members of the public hardship by requiring that they <br />walk 1,200 feet along the pali edge to access this beloved beach and traditional fishing grounds. <br />Members of the public have testified at the Planning Commission hearings on this matter that <br />they have lived in this area their whole lives and driven to the lighthouse to park and access the <br />beach and it is a hardship for them now that they are older to walk such a distance. Members of <br />the public with small children complain that the walk along the pali is too far and have also <br />objected to being denied access to the beach through inconvenience. <br />‚I have ordered a copy of an instrument dated March 27, 1912,ƒ which describes a perpetual <br />right-of-way,20feetwide,infavorofParcel13.‚Iamassumingthatthisparcelanditsrightof <br />way is federal public land reserved for a light station. My hope is that we can include a <br />requirement for the developer to allow members of the public use of the established right-of-way <br />to the light station. I would hope to protect the publics right to drive to the lighthouse in a <br />hearing scheduled for Thursday. The developer always has the option of manning the gateƒ to <br />the subdivision ‚to log in visitors to the lighthouse and the other historical sites in the <br />development. <br />‚This property is lower than any other spot in the area and has recreational value in as much it <br />provides the public parking and beach access, which I hope is compatible with the Coast Guards <br />use of the land. If you need more time to research this matter, could you please write a letter <br />stating such and fax it to me to use at the hearing tomorrow?ƒ <br />She actually e-mailed me and said she has her lawyers working on it, but she cant get back to it <br />until October. But there are several new laws that are mandating that the military consider these <br />sorts of uses for their land and lighthouses, also. So theres sort of a precedence to consider this. <br />Okay. <br />So, then, Id like to read the letter. I did send you a letter requesting that you postpone any <br />decisions today, and Im still asking that you do this. One is I hope that the Pepeekeo <br />Association is successful in their writing up of their agreements. Its still my option to join the <br />Pepeekeo Association. At the moment, there are no access, the access to the shoreline is only by <br />this private agreement. The County hasnt implemented their rules so I cannot technically use <br />the public access. So if I want to go to the shoreline, my only option is to join the association. I <br />understand people from up and down the coast are joining. So, as a member of the public who <br />may want to join and whose only option to gain access to the shoreline would be to join, Id like <br />to look at the agreement and maybe make comment on it. And I think that you shouldnt rush <br />this hearing. And Ill read my letter to you. I hope its not too harsh regarding todays current <br />applications. <br />19 <br /> <br />