My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
public would like to continue to drive to the lighthouse, park, and access the beach off Aila Point <br />as they have for decades without harm to the Coast Guards light station equipment. <br />The Planning Commission is reviewing the developers application for an SMA Permit to <br />subdivide portion of, Im just going to say, I said portion of Parcel 01, but now its Lot 70, <br />surrounding the Coast Guards lighthouse parcel 13 tomorrowof which you should have <br />received notice. Continental Pacific, LLC has purchased and gated hundreds of acres around the <br />parcel owned by the Coast Guard causing members of the public hardship by requiring that they <br />walk 1,200 feet along the pali edge to access this beloved beach and traditional fishing grounds. <br />Members of the public have testified at the Planning Commission hearings on this matter that <br />they have lived in this area their whole lives and driven to the lighthouse to park and access the <br />beach and it is a hardship for them now that they are older to walk such a distance. Members of <br />the public with small children complain that the walk along the pali is too far and have also <br />objected to being denied access to the beach through inconvenience. <br />I have ordered a copy of an instrument dated March 27, 1912, which describes a perpetual <br />right-of-way,20feetwide,infavorofParcel13.Iamassumingthatthisparcelanditsrightof <br />way is federal public land reserved for a light station. My hope is that we can include a <br />requirement for the developer to allow members of the public use of the established right-of-way <br />to the light station. I would hope to protect the publics right to drive to the lighthouse in a <br />hearing scheduled for Thursday. The developer always has the option of manning the gate to <br />the subdivision to log in visitors to the lighthouse and the other historical sites in the <br />development. <br />This property is lower than any other spot in the area and has recreational value in as much it <br />provides the public parking and beach access, which I hope is compatible with the Coast Guards <br />use of the land. If you need more time to research this matter, could you please write a letter <br />stating such and fax it to me to use at the hearing tomorrow? <br />She actually e-mailed me and said she has her lawyers working on it, but she cant get back to it <br />until October. But there are several new laws that are mandating that the military consider these <br />sorts of uses for their land and lighthouses, also. So theres sort of a precedence to consider this. <br />Okay. <br />So, then, Id like to read the letter. I did send you a letter requesting that you postpone any <br />decisions today, and Im still asking that you do this. One is I hope that the Pepeekeo <br />Association is successful in their writing up of their agreements. Its still my option to join the <br />Pepeekeo Association. At the moment, there are no access, the access to the shoreline is only by <br />this private agreement. The County hasnt implemented their rules so I cannot technically use <br />the public access. So if I want to go to the shoreline, my only option is to join the association. I <br />understand people from up and down the coast are joining. So, as a member of the public who <br />may want to join and whose only option to gain access to the shoreline would be to join, Id like <br />to look at the agreement and maybe make comment on it. And I think that you shouldnt rush <br />this hearing. And Ill read my letter to you. I hope its not too harsh regarding todays current <br />applications. <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.