My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SKOGSTROM:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Lim? <br />LIM:I think perhaps the only clarification that I would make is on the Final <br />Subdivision Plat Map Approval of our Subdivision No. 7644 that Ms. Rohr was referring to. <br />The Subdivision Plat Map, and you can kind of see this on your colored aerial photo, you can <br />even see the out parcel, the Coast Guard parcel outlined in red with a little squiggly access to the <br />Beach Road. We do not know, I dont have the 1912 document in front of me but we do have <br />the Final Subdivision Map that shows two access easements. One is a roadway easement for <br />Liber 17617, page 279, and the other one, which is side-by-side, is a 20-foot wide right-of-way. <br />And what I would expect that we would see, because this was all plantation lands before, is that <br />the easement document would say, you know, 20-foot wide right-of-way to over and across <br />parcel blank, which would have been the big sugar cane parcel. So I dont anticipate that <br />weregoingtohaveanyproblemswithlandlockingparcels.Thesubdivisionmaphasthosetwo <br />references to the rights-of-way to the Beach Road. <br />GALDONES:Hearing no further question, no further comments, Commissioners, there <br />are three recommendations submitted to you. We shall take them, action on those separately. <br />First is the Continental Pacifics State Land Use Boundary Amendment application <br />(SLU 03-006); and the Department is recommending a favorable recommendation be forwarded <br />to the County Council. <br />Before we do that, Id like to enter into the record, also, the letters that Mr. Skogstrom had <br />mentioned, one from June Rabago, of which you should have a copy, and her testimony is in <br />support of the development; and from Mr. Ed Johnston, and he also is supporting the <br />development. Both persons were here earlier but they had to leave. <br />So, with that, Commissioners? Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair, with regard with the Continental Pacific, LLC State Land Use <br />Boundary Amendment application (SLU 03-006), I move that the Hawaii County Planning <br />Commission send a favorable recommendation to the County Council for the reasons and with <br />the conditions as recommended by the Planning Director. <br />MCCALL:Second. <br />GALDONES:It has been moved by Commissioner Springer, seconded by Commissioner <br />McCall, that Continental Pacific, LLCs State Land Use Boundary Amendment application <br />(SLU 03-006), be given a favorable recommendation and be forwarded to the County Council. <br />Discussion? Hearing none, Norman? <br />HAYASHI:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Yes. <br />27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.