My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:25:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MR. MORTARA:Not even the Department of Transportation knows who owns it. <br />YUEN:Well, Ive talked about roads in limbo before. This is a little bit <br />different because this is a newer situation where the road was, its not one of these really <br />old roads like a homestead road. My expectation is though that this is a County road, that <br />this is the end result, that this will be like a County road because the State is going to end <br />up successfully disclaiming responsibility for anything except the roads in the State <br />Highways System. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:With regard to process, and I dont mean to abbreviate further <br />discussion on this, but I guess I would ask of the Planning Director if that Section 3 of the <br />HearingsOfficersreporttousissufficientintermsofconditions,oriftherewouldbe <br />any amendments or additions to it from the Planning Department? Its so that we can <br />begin to poise ourselves to move on to action on this. <br />YUEN:Well, this would be for Section, you mean the whole of Decision <br />and Order -? I was going to suggest that we talk about signage. We dont have any <br />condition on signage. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chairman, with regard to process, my question is if no <br />exceptions have been filed, do we just move forward with our motion on the application <br />based on the Hearings Officers report, or would there be a re-write and something <br />forthcoming from the Planning Department? <br />YUEN:We dont have anything further except that in reviewing this and <br />listening to the discussion, I think that we should add a condition on signage, that <br />signage, and I was trying to formulate something. But I would say that signage would be <br />the minimum function, signage visible from the Volcano Highway should be a minimal <br />functional signage and be reviewed and approved at the time of Plan Approval. <br />DARROW:Can that be added to Condition No. 2 regarding -? <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />DARROW:Okay. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Mortara, you wish to comment on the signage condition? <br />MR. MORTARA:Yes. It seems to be certainly an applicable condition, although I <br />would hate to go into Planning and then have them tell me that my sign can be no bigger <br />than 4 by 6 inches. That could be problematic. You know, what is a functional sign? <br />Certainly weve seen a variety of signs on the Belt Highway coming up from Hilo. I <br />12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.