My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:25:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:The issue is basically if -. <br />MR. MORTARA:Or the fact that its developed at all? <br />GRAHAM:No. I have no problem to the development at all, so I have no <br />problems supporting the application. But I dont want to start a pattern of extra ingress or <br />egress onto the highway beyond what is already planned there, because I think its a high- <br />speed highway that, you know, youre not going to build deceleration lanes and all. It <br />just feels like were going in the wrong direction. <br />SIRACUSA:I have a question, is there a, of Corp. Counsel or maybe of the <br />Director. Is there any way that we can approve this and specify that it should not set a <br />precedent for, make a development, you know, major accesses from the highway? <br />GALDONES:Okay. Norman? Is Norman there? Lost Norman. <br />YUEN:I can comment on that. Well, we can, you can say that. But to <br />someextent,tosomeextenteverythingyoudoisaprecedent,tosomeextenteverything <br />you do is based on a particular circumstance. So I dont know that saying something like <br />that really makes that much of a difference. As a general policy, what Commissioner <br />Graham and you are saying, we agree with. We looked at the situation and it looked, it <br />was a, given that it was a pretty low-key operation as far as level of traffic, we were <br />talking about an ingress that was, an ingress that was acceptable to the Department of <br />Transportation. The fact that, it would be a more desirable way to set this up as a, if they <br />had set, if they had set this up using the Old Volcano Road as a frontage-type road and <br />kept it. But from what we understand the Old Volcano Road, although physically there, <br />has been abandoned from the standpoint of maintenance and responsibility; and the <br />properties were, had been all approved as flag lots. The properties that actually front on <br />the Old Volcano Road had been approved as flag lots out to the highway, so thats the <br />way that the Department of Transportation -. <br />SIRACUSA:Thats a done deal already. <br />YUEN:Has set up the lots along the road. Whether, so thats the given <br />situation, and thats -. And I understand what youre saying and Commissioner Graham <br />is saying, and we went down this path in-house; and, on balance, we decided that we <br />would accept the ingress only and the egress out through the back. <br />MR. MORTARA:Yeah, I just wanted to stress, too, that the scope of our project is <br />really very low key. Its not an Akatsuka, its not a Blanes Drive-In. You know, its an <br />ongoing business and we really, we went through this entire process in order to relocate <br />in an area that would help to develop our business and, hopefully, create more jobs. And, <br />you know, were talking about, were figuring maybe five or ten cars a day coming onto <br />the property to see what were doing and to look at some of our products, and things like <br />that. So, you know, Ive totally recognized and lived in Volcano long enough to really <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.