2008-09-19 TOHANAKOHALA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WATANABE: Okay. Mr. Moore, have you had a chance to review the recommendations by the Planning Director, as well as the conditions? MOORE: Yes, I have. WATANABE: And do you have any objections, or are you in agreement to the conditions that were set forth? MOORE: Yes, we are in agreement with the conditions. WATANABE: Do you have anything else you’d like to add? MOORE: Yes. In terms of the question with respect to the access, the driveway access to Lot 1would be somewhere probably closer to the makai boundary of the property about as far from the road as we can get. That is where it’s levelest, there is a nice building site there, and we would avoid then having to deal with the drainage way. For the record we are still going to have one access to the original parcel; the road access is going to be on an adjacent road lot basically. But because a subdivision condition says one access for the subdivision even though we have two lots, we felt we needed to amend this condition. WATANABE: Thank you. MOORE: And, excuse me, it would be a driveway lot and we know we need to meet all of the driveway access viewplane requirements of the Department of Public Works. WATANABE: And I noted that it seems the frontage along that roadway is about 130 feet. Is that correct? MOORE: I think it’s more than that but I don’t have the exact dimension; it’s a pretty major frontage there. WATANABE: Thank you. Do we have any questions for the applicant or their representative? Fellow Commissioners, any questions? Seeing none, then, would that be it for your presentation? MOORE: Yes. Again, we have no objections. We understood the requirement for affordable housing; we actually proposed that as part of our application. The other conditions, we are agreeable. WATANABE: Are you going to provide any testimony, sir? ACREE: No, no need. EXHIBIT A 4