My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-09-21 TIBBETSON
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-09-21 TIBBETSON
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:30:20 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:30:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
such rules with Special Permits, so you will continue to revote until you have five votes <br />favorable or five votes unfavorable. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Yuen. We’re going to hear from Mr. Torigoe before long, <br />but I’d like to just ask the Commissioners first if they have any comments on what they’ve heard <br />or any understandings that they’d like clarified or questions to those who spoke before us about <br />the specific issue of whether we are precluded from entertaining another motion to approve this <br />application today. Commissioners? Yes, Commissioner Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: No. No comment. <br />GRAHAM: No comment. Mr. Matsukawa, since you did hear the other two parties <br />speak after your depiction of what’s your correspondence was, do you have any rebuttal you <br />want to make for what you heard to them? <br />MATSUKAWA: I would only emphasize that the parties have relied upon the <br />Commission’s Rules, and they are entitled to the protections given to them by those Rules. <br />Thank you. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you, Mr. Matsukawa. Commissioner Iwashita just arrived. I’d like <br />to just fill him in on where we’ve gone so far. <br />IWASHITA: Okay. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. So we are taking up the Ibbetson Special Permit application. And <br />basically we have copies of the minutes from the last meeting in West Hawaii, which dealt with <br />Ibbetson’s application, so we all kind of took a minute and read them over just to refresh <br />ourselves in them, and they seem to be acceptable as written to the Commission as a <br />representation of what took place. Then I went to the parties of the hearing here today, and <br />asked them to specifically comment in regard to Mr. Matsukawa’s correspondence with us, <br />which suggested that it’s not correct for us to entertain another motion to approve after we failed <br />to approve that motion at the last hearing. So we’ve heard from all the parties in regard to that. <br />And then I just asked the Commissioners if they had any further comments they would like to <br />make from what they heard from the parties. And so from here I was going to ask Mr. Torigoe, <br />our Corp. Counsel, for his word on how we should deal, how he feels we should deal with this <br />consideration put to us by Mr. Matsukawa of being restricted from entertaining another motion <br />to approve the application today. Mr. Torigoe? Did you want to say anything first, <br />Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA: I apologize for my late arrival. No, I understand what you just explained. <br />GRAHAM: Thank you. Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’m going to try and be very concise and <br />simple about what can become a real hairball, you know, when you let lawyers play with <br />Robert’s Rules and things like that. Basically, starting with the impact of Robert’s Rules, even if <br />it does apply -. And I’m basically going to just real simply state what I would end up saying if <br />this matter gets up on appeal; and so I’m going to say something that, nothing that I wouldn’t, <br />EXHIBIT A <br />6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.