2003-09-22 tpuna - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

HAYASHI:Mr. Chair, before you do that, thereÓs one more change that weÓd like to, a minor change that weÓd like to make to the proposed conditions. And that would be to have proposed condition, and this is for the Change of Zone, and that would be to proposed Condition I. If you look at the top of page 2, it says, ÐPublic Works Construction R-34 (revised),Ñ we would like to add the words, after Ð(revised),Ñ Ð- top illustration of page.Ñ In other words, thereÓs two illustrations on page, on this page, that references the R-34 Construction. So we want them to utilize the top illustration of that page. YUEN:Just to, a little further explanation. There are two illustrations, one being the top of page, which shows a roadway section that has, that does not have a sidewalk. It has a paved swale and shoulder. The bottom of the page has a sidewalk. Being that the adjoining property owner, the McCully MCX rezoning did not require a sidewalk, we are not requiring a sidewalk on the Milo Street frontage. We would be requiring a paved shoulder and swale as shown in that standard detail. GALDONES:Okay. Thank you. Norman, any other amendments? HAYASHI:Just for clarification purposes, again, perhaps this is directed to the Planning Director, on proposed Condition D, is your intent to delete that from the rezoning, but transferring that to the State Land Use? YUEN:Yes. GALDONES:Mr. Fuke, having heard the amendments made to Condition Approval Item I, do you have any remarks? FUKE:No. I think that thatÓs a very good clarifying comment. I didnÓt realize that there had been two illustrations on that. The applicant always understood that itÓs not going to be a curb, gutter, sidewalk section. So the DirectorÓs proposal is right on point. And, likewise, on Condition B, to have it transferred to the State Land Use Commission, I think thatÓs, you know, with the comments noted earlier, I understand that. GALDONES:Commissioners, any further question of Mr. Fuke? If none, is there anyone from the public here to testify on this subject matter? Seeing none, then Commissioners, weÓll take the State Land Use Boundary Amendment first. It comes with a favorable recommendation. WhatÓs the wishes of the Commissioners? Commissioner Kubota? KUBOTA:Mr. Chairman, I move that this Commission send a favorabl recommendation on SLU 03-001 to the County Council, and I think I understood that there is to be a condition added to that. HAYASHI:ThatÓs correct. The condition -. 9