My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-22 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-22 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:36:47 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:36:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
comment, I have no way of knowing whether maybe the negotiating group and all <br />discussed this and had their own reasons why they did it in a different way or something <br />like that. So itÓs hard for me, kind of very late in the game, to try to base any change to <br />what has been done on the limited knowledge I have or on one or two personsÓ testimony <br />when it has been negotiated. So -. <br />ROHR:Well, they have a special agreement that doesnÓt apply to the <br />public. ItÓs not the same agreement that the public has to live under. And the Sierra Club <br />was going to come today but they were told not to come till this afternoon because this <br />hearing was going to be so late. IÓve gone month-after-month asking for the shoreline <br />trail and then told by the Planning Director theyÓre working on it, theyÓre working on it. <br />All I had to go by is this final subdivision that was approved and the easement documents <br />that are written on that; and itÓs not complete, itÓs not a complete picture. ThereÓs not <br />enough easements in place. And we have Christopher YuenÓs word that, oh, they will be <br />in place. But, hey, I want to make sure that the things that I care about are in place, too, <br />not just Pepeekeo Community Association that gets a special deal. They have a special <br />deal, you know, the fishing people have a special deal. The Community Association can <br />go through the gate with vehicular access. The public canÓt do that, we have to walk. <br />Okay, so, IÓve reviewed it; and itÓs not all very clear how you park. At least make the <br />developer put in signs so itÓs clear. That should, I mean, we have signs down in our <br />neighborhood and the County had to pay for them. Do you think the County should have <br />to pay for all these signs? ItÓs a very complicated system to a <br />access for 50 years. NothingÓs changed. ItÓs just that now everybodyÓs trying to <br />manipulate their way around gates and no trespassing signs and trails. So at least there <br />should be signs. And you canÓt judge by the Community Association, they have a special <br />deal. <br />KUBOTA:Mr. Chairman? <br />GALDONES:Ms. Kubota. <br />KUBOTA:IÓd like to ask Corp. Counsel a question, if I may. <br />GALDONES:You may. <br />KUBOTA:Thank you. Ms. Rohr keeps referring to special deals that are <br />made by the Applicant with the community association and the fishing group. Is it illegal <br />to do that? Are they permitted to do it or is it something that is illegal? <br />OÓTOOLE:No, itÓs not illegal. ThatÓs just between them. So what you have <br />to focus on is what conditions you want to make for the SMA perm <br />totally familiar but I believe there was some kind of appeal of the subdivision and then <br />there were settlements and agreements made probably as a result of that. But -. <br />14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.