My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-09-22 TALLIANCE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-09-22 TALLIANCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:38:44 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:38:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
population of the islands, and particularly here on the Big Island and the at-risk population. <br />That’s what we’ve done for 60 years in the State of California. <br />So I just wanted that to be kind of laid, you understand who I am, where my heart is at and what <br />are intentions are. Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Thank you. Thank you very much. Okay? All right, you can be seated at <br />this time and we can go into testimony. All right. We have a lot of testifiers today. We have 19, <br />20 testifiers. So, because of that, I’d like to ask that you be brief, to the point, and if you can <br />limit your testimony to three minutes. Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Chair, thank you. In consideration of the Petition for Standing in a <br />Contested Case Hearing, if it pleases the Chair, perhaps we should address whether the petitions <br />do have standing. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Yeah. We were just kind of looking at the rules and it seems like we <br />should allow for the testimony before we go to that; and the public testimony may actually, some <br />of them may actually address some of the standing issues as well. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Galdones? <br />GALDONES:Well, if that is what the rules say then we have rules to follow. But where <br />I was coming from is that I wanted those who were going to be making testimony understand <br />and realize whether there will be a Contested Case Hearing, and they may want to reserve their <br />comments for the Contested Case Hearing before the Hearings Officer, who will make a <br />recommendation based on those testimonies. That is where I was coming from. But if the rules <br />provide that the public testimony precedes the Petition for a Contested Case Hearing, then so be <br />it. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Torigoe? <br />TORIGOE:Yeah, I think that’s basically how the rules read, although, you know, the <br />point is well taken that the public should be informed that if there is standing granted to the <br />proposed Intervenors there will be a formal Contested Case; and at every meeting on the <br />Contested Case, there will also be an opportunity for public testimony. So bear that in mind. <br />Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. So the public, so testifiers, you’re hearing our discussion. So there <br />is a possibility that this, that you may be testifying again if you so choose, if we as a Commission <br />grant the Intervenor Standing in a Contested Case. So that being said, again, I’d like to limit the <br />testimony to three minutes. And some of you we’ve actually received letters from, so I ask that <br />you not read your letter. If you could just state kind of your feelings toward the application, <br />we’d appreciate that. <br />Okay, let me call on Mark Grandoni, forgive me if I mispronounce your names, Mike Isaacs, <br />and -. I have several names here but then I have a little quotation, “Give my time to Lani <br />EXHIBIT A <br />5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.