2005-09-30 TTINGUELY - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

GRAHAM:Jeff, one of the ones where you changed the conditions were where the conditions are proposed conditions are being modified with a number 9 on the archaeological? DARROW:Okay. GRAHAM:Could you just give kind of like a common sense explanation of what-? DARROW:Why they would delete that? GRAHAM:Yeah, you know what the- what the old conditions would have required and what the new conditions are requiring as far as you know what, in common sense terms whats going to happen. DARROW:In regards to condition 9? GRAHAM:Yes. DARROW:Okay we had received a-. Since our last and this brings up a good point,thankyou.Sinceourlasthearingwehavereceivedacommentletterfromthe Department of Land and Natural Resources updating us on the plans that have been submitted and the processes that theyre in. And so some of the plans have already been submitted and other plans are still needed and so were trying to bring this condition. This is basically a standardized condition but were trying to detail it more for this specific application. SPRINGER:Commissioner Watanabe? WATANABE:Im sorry I had no questions. SPRINGER:I have a question. Curtis Tyler I believe made reference to a mauka- makai access and also had some concerns about-, I guess it was this access be like at Alii Cove, is that addressed? DARROW:I dont believe that we were able to address that. We were-. If I was, remember correctly we were talking about possibly implementing a mauka-makai along the north boundary of this property but I dont remember if-. It doesnt look like we actually addressed that, thank you for bringing that up. SPRINGER:Okay. DARROW:This was brought up by Curtis Tyler. Maybe the Applicant can actually speak to that. SPRINGER:Commissioners any further questions of Mr. Darrow? Good morning Mr. Mooers. MOOERS:Good morning. EXHIBIT B 3