My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-30 TINABA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-09-30 TINABA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:43:43 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:43:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
over they cant ride their bicycles over there unless they make some kind of cut through. So, <br />with the kind of good planning process that we learned about and I think we all kind of know <br />in our minds is you want to have some kind of a grid. So that people can go from one place to <br />another and not always have to run out to the highway. So I think its excessive to ask this <br />applicant for his agricultural rezoning to make County paved roadways through his place. But <br />I do feel like he should make a public access to take these other side roads which already <br />exists and which would be sort of dead-ended by his property. I think he should make an <br />easement available to the County so that at the Countys expense or somebody elses expense <br />in the future there can be a continuation or flow so everybody doesnt have to run to the <br />highway all the time to get anywhere. Anyway, I reckon as were only making a <br />recommendation here and the County Council will decide on this issue but I think its very <br />important and I think that whole area of Waimea, whatever we can do to bring about some <br />lateral flow in the subdivisions would be very good. And Im disappointed that the Planning <br />Department is willing to have these things kind of stub out the way they are in this <br />application. <br />SPRINGER:Mr.YuencouldyourespondtoMr.Grahamscomment. <br />YUEN:Allthosearereallyvalidpoints.Ifthiswere,iftheGeneralPlanfor <br />this area-. Better to look at the map on the left. And you see the subject property with the red <br />dot and then you see the blue area between the 2 green areas right now thats all open fields. <br />And in the General Plan its important agricultural land. If it-, on the lower part and some <br />extensive on the part. If we were looking at the General Plan as this at being an urban area in <br />the future with residential neighborhoods we surely would-, even if this were, even if this <br />project were still coming in with 4-acre lots or 5-acre lots. We would still insist upon cross <br />street connection across this property, perhaps by way as you suggest of easement rather than <br />by constructing it at this time. Im not opposed to having a-, requiring a reservation of a street <br />for the Hauhoa Street extension, which is a lower street. The upper street I do believe that it <br />hits a gully and you wouldnt be able to get across there feasibly you wouldnt be able to <br />build something across there feasibly. Im not 100% sure of that but thats from what I see on <br />the topographic maps and what Ive looked at on the ground there. And Id also, Id like to <br />see what comments the applicant has on that. I think what youre saying is valid. Its less <br />important because this is likely you know if we, if there is further development in this area its <br />likely to be very low density rather than a residential kind of density. But I think it has merit <br />the idea of extending at least of having a road reserve for at least Hauhoa Street that if there is <br />rezoning or subdivision of the lots in between then those can also have access into the <br />subdivision and create more of a grid above the main highway there. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. Yuen. Mr. Inaba do you have any response to <br />Commissioner Graham and Director Yuens comments? <br />INABA, J.:Theyre talking about the Jardine area, providing a road reserve across <br />here. Hes saying that the adjoining property has access already from Mamalahoa Highway. <br />SPRINGER:Im sorry could you repeat that please? <br />INABA, J:Mr. Inaba says that the adjoining lot has access-. <br />EXHIBIT F <br />17 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.