My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-30 TINABA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-09-30 TINABA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:43:43 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:43:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Mm, hm. <br />ALAMEDA:I just wanted to get a feel for Commissioner Graham on his earlier <br />point and then kind of it you would please your feeling of kind of where youre at? I think <br />you raised a good concern thats why regarding this applicant. <br />SPRINGER:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:You mean something different than what I said before or? <br />ALAMEDA:Just given what youve heard, since now this is the time we can discuss. <br />GRAHAM:Sure. Well when I originally saw this application I was concerned <br />about cutting down ag size but I really appreciated Director Yuens discussion and the <br />recommendationherewhichIthoughtwasquiteonpointsothatImcomfortablewiththe <br />change in ag sizes in this area. And again Im in support of this rezoning but I was very <br />concerned about losing lateral access along between the subdivisions because I see that <br />problem there all the time. And I actually have a sister who lives on one of the different roads <br />and I see the problems that kids have there and everything. So I just want to try and use this <br />opportunity to at least keep our options open in that regard. <br />SPRINGER:Any further discussion? Commissioner Alameda? <br />ALAMEDA:I feel little bit-, about the flooding situation I feel like we just kind of-, <br />not really revisiting that somehow and I feel little bit uncomfortable about-. Cause I know <br />part of our decision is you know like are we enhancing the quality of life, quality of life issue <br />and we are for the Inabas but we probably wouldnt be for the surrounding properties given <br />the flooding situation. So, in terms of supporting this applicant Im still 50/50 thats why Im <br />looking for you know, other input so it could help me with my decision. <br />SPRINGER:Other Commissioners we hear Commissioner Alamedas concern. His <br />concern that the flooding may be exaggerated or exacerbated by this approval. Mr. Yuen do <br />you have any input to make to the Commissioner? <br />YUEN:I understand the Commission members concern when members of the <br />public come and they tell us they have a problem. And I believe what they say. However we <br />are looking here at a subdivision where we havent seen anything that really indicates that this <br />subdivision will make it worse. As members of the County who live on a-, who live in a <br />subdivision with County dedicated roads and infrastructure they can expect to County to try to <br />solve their problems for them as it stands yeah. But its not something that the Planning <br />Commission is responsible for doing. So, and naturally this application being a public <br />hearing is a forum for people. And its very natural they come-, its a forum where they can <br />voice their concerns about the existing condition and say look dont make it worse. I would <br />be-; we should do what we can in this rezoning to avoid making things worse. I dont think <br />we should hold up the rezoning because of actions not taken that would make things, it would <br />make the existing condition get better. <br />EXHIBIT F <br />22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.