Laserfiche WebLink
LIM: No, we donÓt. We are doing, all we are doing is we are following the dictates of the <br />Department of Public Works and the Kona CDP to stub out to the s <br />HOUSEL: Okay. Have you spoken with the adjacent landowner? <br />LIM: IÓve spoken to him a long time ago, and I donÓt know what his current plans are. <br />HOUSEL: I see, okay. Now, one of the things you stated in your application was that you felt this <br />land qualified to be infill per the Kona CDP. Could you explain that, please? <br />LIM: ThatÓs correct. The Kona CDP was essentially, I think, at least in my opinion, was set up to <br />identify areas within Kona that would be proposed for a development, more so that the outside <br />areas, and the infill was areas of land development in the general boundaries of existing urban and <br />suburban areas. And we feel that it complies with the Kona CDP in that weÓve got existing urban <br />and suburban areas immediately surrounding it. I think you saw from the General Plan LUPAG <br />Map where the Urban Expansion Area was, that entire area should be going out to residential; there <br />is a plan to do that in the General Plan anyway. <br />HOUSEL: It seems like to me the definition as stated in the Kona CDP is infill is intended for land <br />that has been previously developed or is surrounded by existing developments, is that correct? <br />LIM: No, I think thatÓs an incorrect statement, and I think you are getting that from one of th <br />glossary terms in the back of the design guidelines. And you should know that that was imported <br />into the Kona CDP, wholesale from the Smart Code without any kind of calibration here. ItÓs <br />inconsistent with the other definitions within the Kona CDP itself. <br />HOUSEL: Okay, thank you. Any other questions? Commissioner Giff <br />GIFFIN: I donÓt know if this question is better asked of Ki, but just looking at the existing <br />roadways, looking at the proposed 45 lots of the subject property, the greatest impact of this traffic <br />that would be resulting from the 45 lots would be where? I mean <br />not kamaÒina to that, so I just want to know, maybe from the applicantÓs representative or from Ki, <br />the greatest impact. <br />LIM: The two main entrances for the project are, you can see where the makai boundary of the <br />parcel is -. <br />BOWMAN: You get the -. Can you use the -? <br />GIFFIN: Jeff has it. <br />LIM: Okay. Off of the project concept, the one connection would be south to Pualena whenever <br />that gets opened up; the other connection would be makai and right there on the makai portion of <br />the project, you see this road tailing off, that will be developed, as the Planning Director was <br />talking, into that Huallai Road connector right at the one straight way where thereÓs adequate sight <br />distance. There will also be another roadway coming from the Huallai Road section back through <br />the makai project, which is Parcel 42, out to Paulehia Street when that gets finally dedicated in the <br />10 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />