My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-09-30 THUALALAI
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-09-30 THUALALAI
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:45:04 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:45:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
HOUSEL: Thank you. Any other comments from the Commissioners? Planning Director. <br />LEITHEAD TODD: I would just say that whether they have an agreement with Lot 22 or not, if <br />and when Lot 22 comes in either for a subdivision or a rezoning, the Department in keeping in <br />consistency with the CDP would require that that road be put in and connect to both the Sugar Lane <br />as well as this, and thatÓs because when we review these, you know, we are required to try and do <br />connectivity between developments regardless of whether they com <br />different time frames because thatÓs the goal. And theyÓre going to be hiccups along the way <br />because some of these subdivisions the roads are private, but the CDP is saying that we need to <br />have the connectivity whether the roads are private or not. So at some point the County may have <br />to address the whole issue of whether you go in and exercise eminent domain to take over the roa <br />or if the community associations want to hand over the liability and road maintenance issues to the <br />County and subsequently dedicate. And also, you note that part of this is because the CDP is in <br />direct opposition to gated communities and thatÓs one reason why they want the connectivity. So <br />when things come in to our office, we try to look at them in terms of not just the application in front <br />us but try to make sure that thereÓs the opportunity to connect in the future. <br />HOUSEL: Thank you. Any other comments? Mr. Darrow, could you read the motion, please? <br />DARROW: Sure. The motion before us is to send an unfavorable recommendation to the HawaiÒi <br />County Council for the State Land Use boundary amendment request <br />HOUSEL: Okay, would you like to -? <br />DARROW: With that, IÓll take the roll. Commissioner Bowman? <br />BOWMAN: Aye. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Nelson? <br />NELSON: Aye. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Beaudet? <br />BEAUDET: Nay. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Giffin? <br />GIFFIN: Nay. <br />DARROW: Commissioner Iokepa? <br />IOKEPA: Nay. <br />DARROW: And Mr. Chairman? <br />HOUSEL: Aye. <br />17 <br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.